Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia
ISSN 2542-0240
DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-6-25
Analyses of modern trade and economic relations in Asia-Pacific region. Research of the roles of the United States of America and China under the conditions of protectionism initiated by the D. Tramp’s administration and stagnation of mega-projects. Crisis of leadership and role of USA and China in regional mega-project (APEC, TPP, RCPEC). Ability of the USA and the PRC to create regional economic priorities, as well as to determine the course of integration processes. Analysis of the main obstacles of realization of American and Chinese leadership potential. Regional integration project initiated by Japan, India and the Republic of Korea and prospects for Indo-Pacific Asia. China-USA competition and main trends of regional integration. Comparative study of opportunities and prospects for bilateral and mega-regional economic projects. As an example, observation of South Korean initiative “New Economic Map” is presented and analyzed. Role of “New Economic Forum” initiated by Bloomberg with support of global big business is examined also. Initiative of Indo-Pacific region, Japan-India economic cooperation are examined, as well as Washington policy to counterweight China foreign economic and political expansion. Analyzing of prospects and consequences of competition between USA and the PRC in Pacific regions. Main issues, opportunities and challenges of Russia’s economic expansion in Asia-Pacific region. Close interconnection between policy, security and economic cooperation in the region: influence on Russia’s Pacific priorities and diplomacy. Characteristics of some problems of Russian “East Policy” during last several years. Some arguments are presented in favor of Russia’s strategy of “policy of focused partnerships”. This kind of policy means prevail of business activity in some special projects as well as in some geographic areas. It is also stressed that it is in Russia’s long-run interests to use of all kind of diplomatic measures in order to minimize any attempts to oppose India to China. But try its best to support cooperation between Russia, China and India in Pacific, as well as in Indo-Pacific region.
Keywords: Asia-Pacific | Indo-Pacific region | regional integration | mega-projects | USA | China | Japan | India | the Republic of Korea | Russia |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Voda Kristina
Japan and U.S. in the Indo-Pacific region under the J. Biden administration
Voda Kristina
Новая эпоха «Рэйва» в Японии. Политические задачи // Свободная мысль. 2020. № 1. С. 51-62.
Kanaev Evgeny
Успокоить Запад, уравновесить Восток [Текст] / Т. Бордачёв, Е.А. Канаев // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2014. – Т. 12. – № 4. – С. 144 – 155.
Karimova Alla
Indo-pacific post-atlantism
Volodin Andrey
India and “the countries of the South Seas”: geo-economic interests and geopolitical imperatives
National and International Strategies in Indo-Pacific. Analysis and Forecast / Mikheev V., Shvydko V. ed. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2020. – 182 p.
Davydov Oleg
К итогам поездки президента Республики Корея Мун Чже Ина в КНР [Текст] / О. В. Давыдов // Russia Policy Review [на корейском языке]. – 2018. – Т. 2. – № 1. – С. 39-41.
Fedorovsky Aleksander
Priorities of the Republic of Korea in Integration Projects
Fedorovsky Aleksander
К итогам визита Президента Республики Корея Мун Чже Ина в страны Центральной Азии [Текст] / А. Н. Федоровский // Russia Policy Review [на корейском языке]. – 2019. – Т. 3. – № 2. – С. 22-24
Fedorovsky Aleksander
АТЭС и перспективы региональной интеграции [Текст] / А. Н. Федоровский // Азия и Африка сегодня. – 2018. – № 6 (731). – С. 44-50. DOI: 10.7868/S0321507518060065.
Kupriyanov Alexey
The Concept of the Indo-Pacific Region in the Works of Indian Political Scientists
Rogozhina Natalia
Regional Security in South-East Asia in the Context of American “IndoPacific Region” Project // RUDN Journal of World History. 2020. Vol. 12. № 4. Р. 338–353. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8127-2020-12-4-338-353
Fedorovsky Aleksander
Российская политика на корейском направлении: приоритеты, вызовы, возможности // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения. 2020. Т. 13, № 2. С. 191-205. DOI 10.21638/spbu06.2020.205.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Китайский фактор в формировании индийского подхода к концепции индо-тихоокеанского региона // Сравнительная политика. 2020. Т. 11, № 2. С. 68-75. DOI 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10020.
Dynkin Alexander , Chemezov S.
Дискурс: к открытым инновациям через национальные мегапроекты и наднациональные инновационные системы [Текст] / А.А. Дынкин, С.В. Чемезов // Вестник Академии военных наук. – 2013. – № 2(43).
Kupriyanov Alexey
Searching for an Economic Basis for the Indo-Pacific: Evolution of India’s Approaches
Kupina Lyudmila
Торговля Республики Корея со странами Центральной Азии в XXI веке // Проблемы Дальнего Востока. 2021. № 1. С. 60-75. DOI 10.31857/S013128120012758-4.
Lukonin Sergey
О транснационализации компаний азиатско-тихоокеанского региона (опыт Японии, Китая, Южной Кореи) / С.А. Луконин // Менеджмент и бизнес-администрирование. – 2010. – № 4. – С. 80–89.
Related publications
![Кризис лидерства и стагнация мегапроектов в АТР: последствия для России [Текст] / А. Н. Федоровский // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. – 2019. – Т. 12. – № 1. – С. 6-25. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-6-25.](/dreamedit/pfoto/AED73BE9_6BFF_BC87_5E72_E89EB43749E3_b.jpg)






No comments