
«Коронавирусная геополитика» стран вишеградского взаимодействия // Вопросы политологии. 2022. Т. 12, № 3 (79). С. 773-785. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2022.79.3.016.
ISSN 2225-8922
DOI: 10.35775/PSI.2022.79.3.016
Pandemic COVID-19 has become a difficult test for the countries of the Visegrad Group. It was the tragic cause of numerous human losses and economic losses, but at the same time gave a new impetus to subregional cooperation in the fight against the infectious threat and its consequences. Since the end of 2020, the pledge of victory over the disease has become a mass vaccination. The main conditions for its conduct are beyond the resource potential of the Visegrad states and transfer the medical and social problem to the sphere of geopolitics. The behavior of the group member countries marked a whole range of approaches to solving an arisen problem. The most unequivocal position was occupied by the Poland authorities that use for vaccinations exclusively drugs approved by Brussels. In Hungary initially existed a flexible approach to the problem of vaccination funds, which corresponded to the pragmatic installations of the government of Viktor Orban. The beginning of mass vaccination in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, on the contrary, was accompanied by a series of scandals and fierce internal political confrontation. The conflicting parties here were not simply supporters and opponents of using the Russian vaccine, but carriers of various views on the strategy of relations with Moscow.
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Labetskaya Ekaterina
Russia-EU: “Soft-Power Risks” in the Eurasian-Arctic Context. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, no 9, vol. 62, pp. 112-120
Chetverikova Anna
The Visegrad Four in Times of Crisis
Olenchenko Vladimir , Mezhevich N.
Вишеградская группа и Балтийская ассамблея: коалиции внутри Евросоюза в российском внешнеполитическом восприятии // Балтийский регион. 2021. Т. 13, № 3. С. 25-41. DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2021-3-2.
Sautkina Vera
Инновационная медицина и общественное здравоохранение: на перекрестке прогресса [Текст] / В.А. Сауткина // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: экономика и управление. – 2019. – № 4. – С. 56-61.
Arbatov Alexey
Россия-США-Евросоюз: проблемы ПРО и РСМД / А.Г. Арбатов // Современная Европа. – 2008. – № 3. – С. 1–22.
Arbatov Alexey
Russia-USA-EU: problems of ABMD and MSRM.
Timofeev Pavel, Khorolskaya Maria
Comparative Analysis of the Germany and France Approaches to Relations with Russia
Frolov Alexander
Коронавирус форматирует проблемы безопасности // Вестник РМАТ. 2020. № 4. С. 9-17.
Arteev Sergei
COVID-19 Pandemic: Conspiracy and Anti-Conspiracy
Avatkov Vladimir, Sbitneva A.
Political course of modern Turke. The main features of domestic and foreign policy of 2019
Timasheva Tatiana
G8 and Russia: interaction experience and institutional development tendencies.
Chetverikova Anna
Структурные изменения в экономиках стран Вишеградской группы // Российский экономический журнал. 2020. № 3. С. 77-89. DOI 10.33983/0130-9757-2020-3-77-89.
Chetverikova Anna
Foreign Trade Relations of the Visegrad Group: the Transformation of the Role of the Russian Federation
Todorov Andrey
Интересы Швейцарии в Арктике [Текст] / А. А. Тодоров // Российская Арктика. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 4-7.
Ivanov Stanislav
Иракская нефть провоцирует новые конфликты [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Международные отношения. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 520 – 522.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Об идее «желтой опасности» и американской версии синофобии // Вопросы национальных и федеративных отношений. 2020. Т. 10, № 8 (65). С. 2096-2109. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.65.8.018.
Chetverikova Anna
Экономические связи России и Вишеградской группы: области взаимного интереса // Россия и современный мир. 2022. № 1 (114). С. 86-102. DOI 10.31249/rsm/2022.01.05.
Frolov Alexander
Пандемия всколыхнула волну майданов и кризисов // Обозреватель-Observer. 2020. № 11 (370). С. 2-36.
Related publications






No comments