
Израильская политика по отношению к великим державам: исторические основы и современное состояние // Восток. Афро-азиатские общества: история и современность = Vostok (Oriens). 2024. № 6. С. 146-156. DOI 10.31696/S086919080033199-5.
ISSN 0869-1908
The present paper analyses the foundations of the Israeli strategy towards the great powers, highlighting its fundamentally consistent character derived from pragmatic considerations and implemented in the form of the multi-vector approach during the Post-Cold War era. Israel was created as an independent state during the Cold War period, which defined the functioning and development of the international system for decades. The Jewish state set out on its journey with the policy of “non-identification”, which was aimed at maintaining a balanced relationship with the two camps. Amid global confrontation, however, this course proved untenable. Following the Cold War, the multi-vector approach emerged as a partial continuation of the initial Israeli strategy, although with certain reservations. Despite steady US support since the late 1960s, Israel sought mutually beneficial relations with various powers, especially the great ones. Yet, the regional and global conditions often significantly constrained Jerusalem’s political flexibility. The dynamics of Russian-Israeli relations exemplify this complexity. On the one hand, they fit into the general logic of the Jewish state’s foreign policy and are inevitably influenced by the global trends. On the other, they certainly have their particular distinguishing features defined by the origins and trajectory of their development and preserve a particular significance for Jerusalem even in the face of new great power rivalry. Consequently, Israel tries to pursue the policy of “walking between the drops”, which naturally has its limitations but nevertheless allows Jerusalem to stick to a relatively flexible course aimed primarily at ensuring its security interests.
Keywords: the State of Israel | foreign policy strategy | great powers | multi-vector approach | “walking between the drops” |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
О демонизации противника во внешнеполитической стратегии США [Текст] / К. С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2018. – № 6. – С. 7-16. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v26i6.5880.
Avatkov Vladimir
Государство-предопределение: государство мира или войны? [Текст] / В. А. Аватков // Право и политика. – 2019. – № 5. – С. 103-110. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.5.29601.
Aleshin Alexander
Внешнеполитическая стратегия Австралии средняя держава в высококонкурентной среде // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН : сетевой журнал. 2020. № 2. С. 63-75. DOI 10.20542/afij-2020-2-63-75. URL: https://www.afjournal.ru/index.php?page_id=281 (дата обращения: 15.10.2020).
Stefanovich Dmitry, Porras D.
Космос как пространство соперничества: угрозы и возможности // Международная аналитика. 2022. Т. 13, № 2. С. 95-106. DOI 10.6272/2587-8476-2022-13-2-95-106.
Nikolaev Nikolai
China’s multicomponent self-positioning system in the Arctic: Theory and practice. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2024, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 260–275. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.302 (In Russian)
Nikolaev Nikolai
China’s multicomponent self-positioning system in the Arctic: Theory and practice. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2024, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 260–275. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.302 (In Russian)
El’yanov Anatoly ,
Государство: стратегии догоняющего развития. Ответственный редактор Эльянов А.Я., Солоницкий А.С., отв. секретарь Карлова Т.А., Умнов А.Ю. Сборник научных трудов, 10 а.л.
Surkov Nikolay
Алжир и великие державы // Свободная мысль. 2023. № 4 (1700). С. 99-112. DOI 10.24412/0869-4435-2023-41700-99-112.
Smirnov Alexey
Испытание Украиной (Польские консерваторы в поисках внешнеполитической стратегии) [Текст] / А.Н. Смирнов // Полития. Журнал политической философии и социологии политики. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 131 – 149.
Belukhin Nikita
Исторические закономерности внешней политики Дании: чем был обусловлен отказ от нейтралитета после Второй мировой войны? // Genesis: исторические исследования. 2021. № 5. С. 1–15. DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2021.5.35633.
Voda Kristina
Japan in the Pacific region. Foreign policy strategy
Lomanov Alexander
Xi Jinping’s Foreign Policy Strategy after the 20th CPC National Congress
Ivanov Stanislav
South Caucasus in regional geopolitics
Zvyagelskaya Irina
США, Израиль и новая реальность на Ближнем Востоке // Разведчик. 2025. № 1(10). С. 18-23.
Shkundin M.Z.
Российская история и внешнеполитическая дискуссия / М.З. Шкундин // Безопасность Евразии. – 2009. – № 3. – С. 355–364.
Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Глобальное государство / В.Б. Кондратьев // Прямые инвестиции. – 2010. – № 3. – С. 66–68.
Lunev Sergey
Foreign policy of India and the impact of the endogenous factors
Gontmakher Evgeniy
Социальное государство и его перспективы [Текст] / Е.Ш. Гонтмахер // Отечественные записки. – 2014. – № 3. – С. 151 – 164.
Surkov Nikolay
"Sisi doctrine”: Egypt and the Great Powers after the “Arab spring”. Comparative study of Cairo’s relations with Washington, Beijing and Moscow // Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations. 2023. Vol. 7, iss. 1. P. 76–87. https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2023-7-1-76-87 (In Russ.).
Ivanov Stanislav
«Исламское государство» - угроза мировой безопасности [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Зарубежное военное обозрение. – 2015. – № 12 (825). – С. 52 – 55.
Related publications




No comments