The UK’s Post-Brexit Trade Policy
ISSN 0201-7083
DOI 10.15211/soveurope62020129141
The article focuses on the positions of Britain and the EU in the process of a post-Brexit trade agreement. The key disagreements between the parties that almost led to the failure of the deal are described. The final agreement reached on December 24, 2020 - a week before the end of the transition period - is analyzed. The agreement formally allowed London and Brussels to declare the achievement of their main goals. At the same time, the agreement did not solve all the problems between the parties. The efforts of the United Kingdom to conclude trade agreements with the United States and some other partners after Brexit are also considered. London's initial reliance on President Donald Trump's promises to conclude the most favorable agreement after Brexit did not materialize, and serious disagreements arose between the parties that could not be resolved quickly. The economic benefits of Brexit are not obvious in the near future.
Keywords: UK | EU | US | brexit | trade agreement | trade talk |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Khesin Efim
Russia - Britain: Economic Relations under Sanctions and Brexit
Savel'ev Alexander
Уместно ли на троих? // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. № 4. С. 202-215.
Aleshin Alexander
Стратегия Великобритании в Африке южнее Сахары после Брекзита // Азия и Африка сегодня. 2020. № 12. С. 27-33. DOI 10.31857/S032150750012795-6.
Podkolzina Inna
Left-Turn Ahead in the UK Economy: The Johnson Factor
Sheliubskaya Nataliya
Брекзит и научно-техническая политика ЕС // Инновации. 2020. № 9. С. 86-90. DOI 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.263.9.011.
Aleshin Alexander, Kislitsyn Sergey
Brexit and the Future of the Special Relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom
Frumkin Boris
Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, сентябрь-ноябрь 2018 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 94. – С. 41-46.
Frumkin Boris
Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, декабрь 2018 г. - февраль 2019 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 95. – С. 26-30.
Khesin Efim
Британия на подъеме [Текст] / Е.С. Хесин // Бизнес и Выставки. – 2015. – № 1 (73). – С. 16 – 17.
Mikheev Vasily
The North Korean Nuclear Issue and The Northeast Asia Situation: Retrospect and Prospect [Текст] / V.V. Mikheev // The Journal of East Asian Affairs. – 2013. – V. 27. – № 1. – P. 75 – 98.
Kvashnin Yuri
The Prespa agreement and prospects for resolving the Macedonian name dispute
Savel'ev Alexander , Naryshkina O.
The New START Extension: The End or the Beginning?
Perova Margarita
U.S. Investment priorities in Trans-Pacific partnership agreement
Moiseeva Daria
Организационная теория в осмыслении процессов дезинтеграции на примере брекзита // Общественные науки и современность. 2024. № 4. С. 54-64. DOI 10.31857/S0869049924040048.
Aleshin Alexander
UK – EU Security and Defence Cooperation after Brexit
Frumkin Boris
Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, декабрь 2019 г. - февраль 2020 г. // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии : электронное издание. 2020. № 99. С. 43-48. DOI 10.1521/eufacts120204348. URL: http://www.edc-aes.ru/data/edcaes/content/user_files/files/99.pdf. Дата публикации: март 2020.
Kharitonova Elena
Weariness and Disillusion: Political Situation in Britain through the prism of Public Opinion
Kvashnin Yuri
Russian-Greek trade and economic relations: mutual interests and political imperatives
Frumkin Boris
Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, июнь-август 2019 г. // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии : электронное издание. 2020. № 98. С. 25-29. URL: http://www.edc-aes.ru/data/edcaes/content/user_files/files/98.pdf. Дата публикации: январь 2020.
Moiseeva Daria
“Repatriation”of Fisheries Policy: the United Kingdom Case
Related publications
No comments