Avoiding nuclear war. Problems of escalation/de-escalation of armed conflicts when approaching the “nuclear threshold”
ISSN 1026-9487
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.06.09
Several historic international conflicts, considered in the article, have presented a risk of nuclear weapons being used. The authors analyze and systematize factors and methods that allowed the sides to prevent the escalation of such conflicts to the “nuclear threshold” and avoid the risk of catastrophic consequences linked to passing such a “threshold”. The opportunity and probability of avoiding a nuclear escalation that is caused by unintended or unsanctioned actions, human and technical mistakes, malfunctions, wrong interpretations of the actions of the potential adversary are discussed. The authors review existing mechanisms of de-escalation of military-political incidents and analyse the complex of confidence-building and security assuring measures. Their validity and applicability in modern conditions are considered through a study of the current tense situation in Russia’s relations with the West/NATO, as well as in a long-term (in scale of decades) perspective.
Acknowledgements. The article has been prepared in the framework of the MGIMO grant project “Systemic Advancement of the International Activities of the MGIMO Institute for International Studies” (Project 2022-02-02, project chaired by A. Nikitin) and presents main findings of the Analytical Report elaborated within this project.
Keywords: nuclear weapons | escalation | de-escalation | armed conflicts | “nuclear threshold” | NATO | confidence building measures | international security |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Stefanovich Dmitry
Вечно сегодняшние // Россия в глобальной политике. 2021. Т. 19, № 6 (112). С. 61-74. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-6-61-74.
Arbatov Alexey
Ядерная перезагрузка и международная безопасность / А.Г. Арбатов // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 36–49.
Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Year-book 2017. Edited by A. Arbatov, S. Oznobishchev. – Moscow: IMEMO, 2018. – 201 p.
Ежегодник СИПРИ 2021: вооружения, разоружение и международная безопасность : перевод с англ. / СИПРИ, ИМЭМО РАН ; редколл.: А.А. Дынкин, А.Г. Арбатов, В.Г. Барановский и др. – Москва : ИМЭМО РАН, 2022. – 964 с. – ISBN 978-5-9535-0611-3. – DOI 10.20542/978-5-9535-0611-3.
Savel'ev Alexander , Naryshkina O.
The New START Extension: The End or the Beginning?
Stefanovich Dmitry, Poletaev S.
Постъядерный ядерный мир // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. Т. 18, № 4 (104). С. 226-241.
Volodin Andrey , Shukla V.
The “Nuclear Confrontation” in South Asia
Zagorskii Andrei
Nuclear Weapons in Europe: around the Status Quo
Dvorkin Vladimir
Nuclear Disarmament: Stressing the Key Impediments / Dvorkin Vladimir
Anichkina Tatiyana
East Asia and the U.S. Nuclear Umbrella / Anichkina Tatiana
Tselitsky Sergey
Стратегические ядерные силы Великобритании в контексте трансформации ситуации в области контроля над ядерным оружием / С.В. Целицкий // Безопасность Евразии. – 2010. – № 2. – С. 565–571.
Savel'ev Alexander
США - Индия: ядерное оружие и политика / А.Г. Савельев // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25: Международные отношения и мировая политика. – 2009. – № 1. – С. 163–167. – Рец. на кн.: Ядерный фактор в американо-индийских отношениях (1991-2008) / С.А. Оборотов – М.: Либроком, 2009. – 320 с.
Pikaev Alexander
Иранский ядерный пазл / А.А. Пикаев // Международная жизнь. – 2008. – № 11. – С. 67–82.
Dvorkin Vladimir , Savel'ev Alexander , Oznobishchev S.
Величайшая осторожность и благоразумие [Текст] / В.З. Дворкин, В.И. Есин, А.Г. Савельев, С.К. Ознобищев // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2015. – Т. 13. – № 4. – С. 50 – 61.
Related publications
No comments