Историческое наследие Португалии как фактор разделения и сплочения общества // Международная аналитика. 2022. Т. 13, № 3. С. 116-129. DOI 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-116-129.
ISSN 2587-8476
DOI 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-116-129
The problem of divided societies and divisions in societies acquires special significance against the background of growing socio-political tensions in the internal and external political dimensions around the world. The West is ceasing to be an area of predominant tranquility and wellbeing. In recent years, in European societies a trend of increasing divisions has also emerged. The article analyzes old and new socio-political divisions (cleavages) within the Portuguese society. The choice of Portugal as a case study is due to the combination of several factors: the memory of the Carnation Revolution, the attitude towards the European project, the imperial past, Catholicism/secularism, and the historical legacy of the Salazar dictatorship. The theoretical and methodological framework of the study is based on the use of the concept of divided societies and constructivism as the main epistemological tools, while the country studies analysis is also applied. The authors attempt not only to identify the basic socio-cultural divisions in the contemporary Portuguese society, but also answer the question of whether it is possible to speak of a divided society in relation to the Portuguese case. The emphasis is placed on the peculiarities of Portugal’s historical path as a post-imperial state whose specificity is largely due, first, to the heritage of the Portuguese maritime empire, and, second, to the legacy of the 1974 Carnation Revolution. The key cleavages that are at the center of the analysis are the legacy of the Carnation Revolution, the European project, the imperial legacy, the religious configuration, and the Salazar heritage. The conclusion is that the Portuguese society has managed to avoid the most negative scenario of the development of the situation and has a chance of consolidation.
Keywords: divided societies | cleavage | historical policy | identity | Portugal | empire |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Ryzhichkin Nikita
Постсоветский Казахстан. Пути формирования национальной идентичности // Свободная мысль. 2020. № 3 (1681). С. 175-186.
Соболевская А.А.
Имперские традиции России и евразийство. /А.А. Соболевская, А.К. Попов // Философия хозяйства. – 2014. – № 3. – С. 109 – 124
Arteev Sergei
Divided Societies in the Russian Scientific Discourse
Popadeva Tatiana
The Balkans: Divided or Separated? Analyzing Narratives of Post-Yugoslav Balkan Identity. — South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2023. Vol. 24. No. 4. Pp. 6–22
Bogacheva Anastasia
Minorities in Modern Iran: Strategies of “Identity Struggle”
Kharitonova Elena
Переосмысление темы империи в современной политической риторике в Великобритании // Политическая наука. 2022. № 1. С. 157-176. DOI 10.31249/poln/2022.01.06.
Gronsky Alexander
The Image of Peter I in the Byelorussian Historical Discourse of the Post-Soviet Period
Vasiliev Victor
Distortion of the history of the Second World War is the treat to the Security of Europe
Ponamareva Anastasia
Национал-популистский захват мемориального законодательства в условиях кризиса на примере Украины // Проблемы современной экономики. 2023. № 3. С. 42-48.
Gronsky Alexander
Imperial Culture and its Relevance at the Beginning of the 21st Century
Prokhorenko Irina
Euroskepticism in the Iberian manner.
Semenenko Irina
Political Identity and Identity Politics / Semenenko Irina S.
Культурно-историческая целостность хозяйств западноевропейских стран и России. М., МАКС Пресс, 2009, 176 с.
Sigachev Maxim, Kharin A., Skakun P.
Neoimperial Project for Contemporary Russia: Theoretical Conceptualization and Political Projecting Attempt
Sigachev Maxim, Arteev Sergei
Социально-политические кливажи во Франции и Германии и фактор правого популизма // Международные процессы. 2022. Т. 20, № 2 (69). С. 117-138. DOI 10.17994/IT.2022.20.2.69.4.
Pantin Vladimir
National and civilization identity: Russian specificity / Pantin Vladimir I.
Nadein-Raevskii Victor
Турция на пороге непростого выбора [Текст] / В.А. Надеин-Раевский // Международная жизнь. – 2014. – № 3. – С. 110 – 125.
Barinov Igor
Белоруссия в тисках памяти: историческое наследие и национальная государственность [Текст] / И. И. Баринов // История и современность. – 2019. – № 2. – С. 107-123. DOI: 10.30884/iis/2019.02.05.
Poletaev A.V., Savelieva I.M.
Историческая наука и ожидания общества / И.М. Савельева, А.В. Полетаев // Общественные науки и современность. – 2009. – № 5. – С. 135–150.
Gronsky Alexander
Способы создания нарратива о прошлом в украинской исторической политике начала XXI века // Тетради по консерватизму. 2024. № 2. С. 109-124. DOI 10.24030/24092517-2024-0-2-109-124.
Related publications
No comments