![Гуманитарная составляющая во внешней политике Великобритании [Текст] / Е. С. Громогласова // Международные отношения. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 42-50. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2018.1.25236.](/dreamedit/pfoto/01DD0F89_0BC6_B434_03D5_0242564A8C0A_b.jpg)
Гуманитарная составляющая во внешней политике Великобритании [Текст] / Е. С. Громогласова // Международные отношения. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 42-50. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2018.1.25236.
ISSN 2454-0641
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2018.1.25236
The subject of the research is the analysis of the humanitarian aspect of the Great Britain's foreign policy. The aim of the research is to define conceptual grounds, instruments and conctents of the humanitarian activity performed by the United Kingdom outside its borders. The main research methods include logical terminology and systemic-functional analysis. Using the logical terminology analysis method, the author has defined conceptual framework of the humanitarian aspect of the Great Britain's foreign policy. Using the systemic-functional approach, the author has studied different activities of the Foreign office. Response to extreme situations abroad is defined as the core element of British humanitarian activity. At the same time, the author offers a wider interpretation of that activity as the project of 'soft power' of the United Kingdom in the modern world. The author analyzes 'soft power' strategies of Britain which humanitarian orientation is mostly apparent. This is the policy to expand educational opportunities and promote development of civil society in different countries and regions of the world. The author also analyses what Britain political elite thinks of possible employment of military force based for humanitarian purposes and how the concept of 'Responsibility to Protect' is viewed by the Britain political class. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author evaluates the influence of Brexit on the change of humanitarian contents and values in the Great Britain's foreign policy. The main result of the research is the author's conclusion about negative consequences of Brexit. The author predicts the decline of humanitarian responsibility and role of the United Kingdom in the modern world. The results of the research can be used in the sphere of education. The research is closed up with the conclusion that there is a great number of factors that influence how states define their own 'humanitarian role' on the global stage.
Keywords: Syria | complex emergency | development aid | humanitarian aid | Responsibility to Protect | soft power | humanitarian diplomacy | United Kingdom | Foreign Office | Brexit |
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Velikaya Anna, Samadov S.
Гуманитарная политика Советского Союза // Обозреватель-Observer. 2020. № 4 (363). С. 56-66.
Kupriyanov Alexey
“Soft Power” of the Indian Navy in the Pandemic Era. Analysis & Forecasting. Journal of IMEMO, 2020, no 4, pp. 40-51. https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2020-4-40-51
Gromoglasova Elizaveta
Гуманитарное присутствие России в Тихоокеанской Азии: формы, масштабы, перспективы [Текст] / Е.С. Громогласова // Международные отношения. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 62-78.
Bakhriev B., Rustamova Leili
Soft Power of a Military Organization: NATO’s Public Diplomacy in Central Asia
Voda Kristina
International Development Assistance and Security Interests in Japan''s Policy
Gromoglasova Elizaveta
Humanitarian Diplomacy in Modern International Politics: A Systemic View. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2018. – 124 р.
Rustamova Leili
Публичная дипломатия России в урегулировании конфликта в Сирии [Текст] / Л. Р. Рустамова // Мировая политика. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 33-37. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2018.1.25576.
Toganova Natalia
Экономика и безопасность как мотивы помощи развитию: пример Германии [Текст] = Economic and security motives in international development assistance : The case of Germany / Н. В. Тоганова // Международные процессы. – 2018. – Т. 16. – № 3. – С. 39-55. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2018.16.3.54.2.
Rustamova Leili
The mechanism of "soft power" implementation and the limits of its use
Kharitonova Elena
British soft power: comparative analysis of instruments, mechanisms and practices
Kharitonova Elena
The UK policy on regulation and prevention of interethnic conflicts in other countries: tools and mechanisms
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция институтов российской публичной дипломатии [Текст] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 3. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760006903-0. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760006903-0-1/.
Kanaev Evgeny
Проблема Южно-Китайского моря: новые категории анализа [Текст] / Е.А. Канаев // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития. – 2017. – № 35. – С. 32-44.
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция государственных институтов публичной дипломатии США [Электронный ресурс] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 1. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760004625-4. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760004625-4-1/.
Shlikhter Alexey
Humanitarian activities of American NGOs and charitable foundations in developing countries
Gromoglasova Elizaveta
Гуманитарный кризис в “северном треугольнике” Взгляд сквозь призму концепции “ответственности по защите” [Текст] / Е.С. Громогласова // Латинская Америка. – 2017. – № 12. – С. 43-54.
Kharitonova E.M. The soft power of the United Kingdom. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2018. – 139 p.
Zagladin N.
Crisis of civilization or ofhumanitariank nowledge?
Artamonova Uliana
Fronts and Forms of Public Diplomacy. Analysis & Forecasting. Journal of IMEMO, 2021, no 2, pp. 49-56. https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2021-2-49-56
Scandinavian Specificity in Facilitating International Development
Related publications






No comments