
The global power of the future: renewal of strategic orientations of India. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 118-133. (In Russ.)
ISSN 1026-9487
Largest by the size of population state of the planet India painfully perceives disbalance between its status in a world order and its own ambitions, Indian leadership coins slogans/goals before its government, business and society to obtain a status by the centenary of the independence of the not only “developed” rather than “developing” country, but more: the status of the leading world power with a global role. Searching the status of the world power in the same row with the Global North powers, India simultaneously somewhat contradictory pretends to a role of the leader of the Global South, activation girts role in G20, BRICS, SCO and other international alliances. Historical friendly ties of India with the USSR/Russia continue to have an impact onto the Indian strategy. India considers interaction with Moscow as a “specifically privileged strategic partnership”, continuously rejects from participation in the Western sanctions and anti-Russian statements, assists in overcoming of the sanction limitations. But in the sphere of security policy India reoriented itself towards partnership with the UYSA, values “anti-China” vector in QUAD and AUKJUS alignments. Strengthening of the pro-American policy collides India more and more with China, and endless repeating of the mantra on the “irreconcilability” of the Indian historic and strategic contradictions with China pushed India in direction of strategic alliance with the USA. Relations of India with Russia got somewhat contradictory character as a result of a clash between proponents of the preservation of strategic partnership, economic cooperation and friendship, from one side, and pro-Western Indian politicians and elites, from the other side, who perceive Russia through the prism of the Western accusations and sanctions, also considering Russia to be the ally of adversarial China. Regarding Ukrainian conflict India tries to claim and wage the policy of “neutrality”, zigzagging between the unwillingness to object to the West and unwillingness to lose special strategic relations with Moscow. In a process of globalization of its own horizon new dimensions of the Indian policy emerge: space policy, Arctic policy, ecological policy of building a unique “green” world power and other new orientations.
Keywords: world power | global power | multipolarity | Global South | India | China | BRICS | Indo-Pacific region | nuclear policy | strategic partnership |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
К вопросу о геополитической идентичности России / К.С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2011. – № 6. – С. 4–10.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Стратегические императивы Индии: от Индийского океана к ИТР и обратно // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2022. № 8. С. 75-89. DOI 10.31857/S2686673022080065.
Aleshin Alexander
Внешнеполитическая стратегия Австралии средняя держава в высококонкурентной среде // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН : сетевой журнал. 2020. № 2. С. 63-75. DOI 10.20542/afij-2020-2-63-75. URL: https://www.afjournal.ru/index.php?page_id=281 (дата обращения: 15.10.2020).
Savel'ev Alexander
Ядерное сдерживание, стратегическая стабильность, противоракетная оборона. Даёт ли ядерный арсенал подлинную безопасность государствам // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 5. С. 20-34. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-5-20-34.
Kupriyanov Alexey
The Concept of the Indo-Pacific Region in the Works of Indian Political Scientists
Mishin Igor
The Indo-Pacific Strategy of the Biden Administration: Continuity and New Trends
Kupriyanov Alexey
Searching for an Economic Basis for the Indo-Pacific: Evolution of India’s Approaches
Kupriyanov Alexey
Китайский фактор в формировании индийского подхода к концепции индо-тихоокеанского региона // Сравнительная политика. 2020. Т. 11, № 2. С. 68-75. DOI 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10020.
Kupriyanov Alexey
SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region) and IPOI (Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative): Shaping India's Security Through Regional Development
Kupriyanov Alexey
Конструируя Аркто-Пацифику // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. Т. 18, № 6 (106). С. 150-162.
Salitskii Alexander, Виноградов А.
БРИКС: на пути к партнерству [Текст] / А. О. Виноградов, А. И. Салицкий // Перспективы. Электронный журнал. – 2018. – № 1(13). – С. 21-26.
Mikheev Vasily
Россия - Тихоокеанская держава? [Текст] / В.В. Михеев // Научные труды международного союза экономистов и вольного экономического общества России. – 2015. – Т. 40. – С. 159 – 173.
Salitskii Alexander
Россия и Китай на Евразийском пространстве: стратегическое партнерство с элементами конкуренции [Текст] /А.Салицкий, Н.Семенова //Восток. Афро-азиатские общества: история и современность. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 69 – 78
Gemueva K.A., Salitskii Alexander, Shakhmatov A.
Индия и Китай в мировой экономике, энергетике и политике. М.: Ин-т стран Востока, 2015, 148 с.
Trubnikov Vyacheslav
Russian-Indian economic integration under the BRICS. Interview with Vyacheslav Trubnikov (Moscow) for the problems of Oriental Studies Journal readers
Mikheev Vasily
Russia-China. “Reloading” the relationship [Text] / V. Mikheev // Russian politics and law. – 2011. – V. 49. –Issue 6. – P.74-93.
Mikheev Vasily
Стратегическое партнерство России и Китая и Корейский полуостров. [Текст] / В.В. Михеев // Russia Policy Review. – 2017. – Т. 1. – № 3. – С. 47-56.
Basov Feodor
Политика Германии в отношении КНР // Современная Европа. 2025. № 2. С. 18-26. DOI 10.31857/S0201708325020020.
Related publications




No comments