Эволюция государственных институтов публичной дипломатии США [Электронный ресурс] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 1. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760004625-4. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760004625-4-1/.
ISSN 2070-5476
DOI 10.18254/S207054760004625-4
Public diplomacy has always been considered one of the strengths of American foreign policy. Researching of the evolution of institutions operating in this field allows seeing the pattern of continuity in terms of methods, used by them, and in terms of their targeted audiences. Throughout the time, activities of those institutions have been directed at the wide foreign public. The range of these activities has included the support for binational centers, American libraries and school abroad; educational exchanges; organization of cultural events and tours; teaching English abroad. Another interesting discovery is that all the transformations that occurred to the institutions conducting US public diplomacy were connected with internal and external political changes. They reflected the tendencies of the development of the general foreign policy course. Also despite the pattern of continuity in certain aspects, one can see contradictory trends as far as the structural changes are concerned. More precisely, at first the responsibility for conduct of public diplomacy belonged to the State Department, then to the independent state agency - USIA, and then again to the State Department. In addition, during the passage of the “stages of evolution” different public diplomacy functions - those related to information and those related to culture and education - originally had been joined under the authority of one institution, later divided between different divisions of the same institution, once again joined and currently are divided again but between separate institutions. The lack of new “stages of evolution” after 1999 paired with rather deficient model, which had been adopted then (featured by the existence of a specific public diplomacy organization for the fulfillment of only information-related functions and the rest of them being transferred to the State Department, probably constitute one of the factors responsible for the rise of anti-Americanism internationally in 21st century.
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция институтов российской публичной дипломатии [Текст] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 3. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760006903-0. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760006903-0-1/.
Bakhriev B., Rustamova Leili
Soft Power of a Military Organization: NATO’s Public Diplomacy in Central Asia
Artamonova Uliana
Обменные программы как инструмент публичной дипломатии США // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2023. Т. 53, № 12. С. 86-98. DOI 10.31857/S2686673023120088.
Artamonova Uliana
J. Biden’s First Term: Renaissance of U.S. Public Diplomacy?
Artamonova Uliana
American public diplomacy during the first year of J. Biden’s presidency
Rogozhina Natalia
«Мягкая сила» в политике Китая в странах Юго-Восточной Азии [Текст] / Н.Г. Рогожина // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития. – 2017. – № 34. – С. 24-33.
Kharitonova Elena
British soft power: comparative analysis of instruments, mechanisms and practices
Frolov Alexander
Дипломатия и разведка: две стороны одной медали [Текст] / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2013. – № 11. – С. 178 – 186. – Рец. на книгу: Дипломатия и разведка как средство осуществления внешней политики государства: общее и особенное/ В. Винокуров. – М. 2013. – 300 с.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
О тотализации войны в гибридном измерении [Текст] / К. С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 9-19. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i3.6396.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Дипломатия канонерок в дивном новом мире // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 2. С. 140-150. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-140-150.
Artamonova Uliana
Реформа иновещания на фоне системного кризиса американской публичной дипломатии // Россия и Америка в XXI веке : электронный научный журнал. 2020. № 4. DOI 10.18254/S207054760013295-1. URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760013295-1-1/ Дата публикации: 30.12.2020.
Frolov Alexander
Военная дипломатия как история и искусство / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 169–178. – Рец. на кн.: История военной дипломатии. В 4-х т./ В.И. Винокуров. – М.: Инженер, 2011.
Pu S., Gill B., Zuenko I., Lomanov Alexander, Vi S.
«Любая страна, если загнать её в угол, будет сражаться». Насколько китайская дипломатия готова к новой эпохе: опрос специалистов из разных стран мира // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 5. С. 208-229. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-5-208-229.
Velikaya Anna, Samadov S.
Гуманитарная политика Советского Союза // Обозреватель-Observer. 2020. № 4 (363). С. 56-66.
Rustamova Leili
Публичная дипломатия России в урегулировании конфликта в Сирии [Текст] / Л. Р. Рустамова // Мировая политика. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 33-37. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2018.1.25576.
Volodin Andrey
Foreign policies of India: a change of the paradigm
Rustamova Leili
The mechanism of "soft power" implementation and the limits of its use
Artamonova Uliana
Formation Mechanism of the American Public Diplomacy’s Strategy
Rogozhina Natalia
The Mask Diplomacy of China in Southeast Asia. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual'nyye problemy razvitiya, 2021, T. I, № 1 (50). Pp. 73–81. DOI:10.31696/2072-8271-2021-1-1-50-073-081
Svistunova Irina, Kvashnin Yuri
Anti-Americanism in Turkey and Greece: a Comparative Analysis
Related publications
No comments