Golunov Serghei
Энергетические рычаги внешней политики // Международные процессы. 2021. Т. 19, № 1 (64). С. 56-73. DOI 10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.3.
Publication Type:
Rubric:


ISSN 1728-2756

DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.3

While employing their energy potentials for advancing their foreign policy interests, Russia and the USA apply various political tools and practices, that can be classified as “positive”, “negative”, regulating energy markets, and reinforcing one’s own potential. The author argues that in both cases the application of energy-related statecraft is largely related either to energy security or to advancing ideologically inspired political interests. These two kinds of incentives can both work together or conflict each other. To pursue their relevant interests, both Russia and the USA have distinctive potentials, resources, and instruments that to a large extent were developed under influence of geopolitical and economic shocks: dramatic growth of global oil prices in 1970s for the USA and centrifugal post-Soviet geopolitical processes in 1990s for Russia. As a negative tool, the USA most often uses various kinds of sanctions to target energy sectors of their opponents, while the strongest Russian weapon is energy supply restrictions. To safeguard one’s own energy security and solidify their political influences both states manage bilateral complementary “producer-consumer” relations, while to stabilize global oil price, both states participate in international energy alliances. For instrumental purposes, both states also take advantage of purposeful or spontaneous transformations of their energy sectors (e.g. consolidation of the Russian energy sector and the U.S. ‘shale revolution’) for foreign policy purposes. In most cases, the effectiveness of applying statecraft tools for advancing energy-related interests proved to be limited. Those sanctions and other ways of pressure that targeted opponents’ energy sectors (especially if applied unilaterally) themselves rarely led to desirable alterations in those opponents’ policies. The results of energy alliances building also have proved to be limited both for Russia and for the USA as those alliances do not secure full-fledged control over global oil prices and are not solid or representative enough.


Keywords: statecraft | foreign policy tools | energy security | pipeline politics | Russia | USA |

Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Klinova Marina
The state and energy security in the world and Europe as a public good

Энергетическая безопасность глобализирующегося мира и Россия. Под ред. Симония Н.А., Жукова С.В. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2008, 354 с.

Energy Security: National, Regional and Global Aspects. Ed. by Yu. Kvashnin, K. Voda. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2013, 121 p.

Dmitriev Sergey
United States: the claim for world leadership in hydrocarbon energy

Экономические аспекты энергетического сотрудничества России с другими странами и безопасность. Авторский коллектив: Симония Н.А. (научный руководитель), Варнавский В.Г., Жуков С.В., Попов В.В., Пусенкова Н.Н., Томберг И.Р. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2006, 129 с.

Sergeev Pavel
Третий энергетический пакет газообеспечения Европейского Союза / П.А. Сергеев // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. – 2012. – № 37. – С. 52–60.

Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Mining Industry in Chile

Varnavskii Vladimir
Private and public partnership in the industry of Russia

Simoniya Nodari
European Union’s energy security and Russia.

Dmitriev Sergey
Obama's Energy Strategy: Relying on Innovation and Technological Leadership. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2014, 162 p.

Malysheva Dina
Афганский эндшпиль и региональная безопасность [Текст] / Д.Б. Малышева // Россия и мусульманский мир. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 94 – 106.

Baikov N.
Нефтяные компании США и энергетическая политика страны / Н.М. Байков // Нефтяное хозяйство = Neftyanoe Khozyaistvo - Oil Industry. – 2009. – № 3. – С. 105–107.

Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Корпоративное управление после кризиса / В.Б. Кондратьев // Прямые инвестиции. – 2011. – № 4. – С. 22–26.

Gracheva Mariya
Управление рисками в государственных ведомствах и опыт Германии / М.В. Грачева // Финансы. – 2012. – № 1. – С. 66–72.

Salitskii Alexander
Central Asia: political and energy issues in the Russia-China format

Romashkina Natalia
Роль научных и образовательных учреждений в реализации Доктрины информационной безопасности 2016 года [Текст] / Н.П. Ромашкина // Международная жизнь. – 2017. – Спецвыпуск "Россия и информационная безопасность". – С. 153-156.

Khesin Efim
Global Governance: Financial Aspect (Book Review «New Approaches to Global Financial Regulation» Edited by L.S. Khudyakova)

Voda Kristina
Новая эпоха «Рэйва» в Японии. Политические задачи // Свободная мысль. 2020. № 1. С. 51-62.

Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Russian Corporate Management after the Crisis / Kondratiev Vladimir B.

Sidorova Elena
Fiscal Policy in Russia during the Crisis / Russia in International Systems: Economy, Politics, Security. Global Development, Volume 8. Ed. by Y. Kvashnin, A.Kuznetsov, N. Toganova, S. Utkin, F. Voitolovsky. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, P. 22-29.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
10/06/2022

The next issue of the journal ME & MO (No. 6, 2022), which opens with a panoramic article by V. Mikheev and S. Lukonin, has been published. The authors dedicated it to China on the eve of the 20th CPC Congress. In the economic block of the magazine special attention is paid to digital currencies.

more...

09/06/2022

An article by Marina Klinova «The State and Energy Security in the World and Europe as a Public Good» was published in the June issue of the journal «Voprosy Ekonomiki» ("Economic Issues") under the heading "International Economics" (in Russian).

more...

Recently Published