Kirichenko Elina
Export Controls as a Tool to Maintain U.S. Leadership in a Changing World. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 1. P. 74-88. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.01.06
Publication Type:


ISSN 1026-9487

DOI 10.17976/jpps/2020.01.06

The article discusses the features of the American system of export control on dual-use products, which allowed it to become an important tool of foreign policy. Using system-historical and systemfunctional methodology, the author analyzed the evolution of the US export controls through the prism of changes in the American concept of national security. The task is to investigate why the system, created during the Cold war, is so popular today. Three periods are designated: the period of the Cold War, the 1990s – the first decade of the 2000s, the present stage. Within each stage the author analyzes significant changes in the export control legislation. The export control policy in the United States was revised in the light of new approaches to the problems of national and international security, as well as foreign policy objectives. In 1994, COCOM was dismantled. In the 90’s and early 2000’ issues of nonproliferation of WMD and prevention of WMD falling into the hands of terrorist groups began to occupy a key place in the policy of national security and export controls of the United States. This contributed to increasing cooperation between Russia and the United States. The two countries managed to improve the multilateral export control regimes, to hold Resolution 1540 in the UN Security Council in 2004, which strengthened the international legal framework of the export controls. There is an acute internal political struggle around the export controls rules. Leading agencies, supported by individual groups of the political elite, are trying to impose their strategic priorities. Export controls are viewed by the business community as a restrictive measure. Naturally, business is lobbying for easing the export controls mode. Academic circles also actively support their right to free exchange of scientific and technical information. One can observe a constant tug of war between supporters of softening and tightening of the regime. The interpretation of US national security is qualitatively expanding due to dispersion of challenges and threats to its global leadership, the emergence of new breakthrough technologies in the civil and defense fields. Particular concern of the USA is the development of China’s military and innovative potential, in connection with which there is a painful attitude to the possible transfers of American technologies to China. Export controls is considered to be the most important mechanism preventing such transfers. At present, the development of the American export control regime is undergoing a new toughening cycle. The position of hardliners within the US political elite in the implementation of such a policy is strengthening. The United States is looking for an enemy and trying to make it common to the entire Western world. The role of embargoes and sanctions in the American export control regime, as well as extraterritorial application of American rules, has increased again. The export control regime is used as a tool to maintain U.S. leadership in a changing world, to reorganize the world order in the interests of the United States. 


Keywords: export controls | national security | foreign policy | dual-use items | technology | intangible technology | critical technology | WMD nonproliferation | antiterrorism | sanctions |

Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Kirichenko Elina
Система экспортного контроля США над продукцией двойного назначения // Международная экономика. 2023. № 3. С. 194-203. DOI 10.33920/vne-04-2303-05.

Yevtodyeva Marianna
Japan: New Trends in Research and Development of Defense and Dual-Use Technologies

Arms control in the new military-political and technological conditions / ed. by Arbatov A.G. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2020. – 177 p.

Pankova Ludmila
Future Space Technologies and Security: the Urgency of Debate. Special Supplement to “Nuclear Proliferation” Collected Articles, Issue 2. Moscow, Carnegie Moscow Center (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace), 2003.

The SIPRI Yearbook 2003. Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Moscow, Nauka Publishers, 2004.

Kirichenko Elina
Контроль над иностранными прямыми инвестициями по соображениям национальной безопасности в США // Международная экономика. 2024. № 12. С. 974-983. DOI 10.33920/vne-04-2412-01.

Toganova Natalia , , ,
Технологии и инновации в российских СМИ [Текст] / Н.В. Тихомиров И.А. Тоганова, М.А. Каменская, И.В. Храмоин // Инновации. – 2016. – № 10. – С. 29 – 37.

Selyanin Yaroslav
U.S. Information and Biotechnology: Catalyzing Effect of COVID-19

Dezhina Irina
Перспективные производственные технологии: новые акценты в развитии промышленности [Текст] / И.Г. Дежина, Пономарев А. // Форсайт. – 2014. – Т. 8. – № 2. – С. 16 – 29.

Kostyukova Korinna
Digitalization of the healthcare sector in Japan based on artificial intelligence technology: key problems and solutions

Arbatov Alexey
Угрозы реальные и мнимые: военная сила в мировой политике начала XXI в. [Электронный ресурс] / А.Г. Арбатов // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2013. – № 1.

Shvydko Vitaly, Danilin Ivan, Kostyukova Korinna
Политика развития передовых производственных технологий в Японии: вызовы и перспективы [Текст] / К.С. Костюкова, И.В. Данилин, В.Г. Швыдко // Проблемы Дальнего Востока. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 81 – 89.

Gusarova Olga
Блокчейны в системе военной контрактации: возможности и проблемы [Электронный ресурс] / О.В Гусарова // Московский экономический журнал: электронный сетевой журнал. – 2019. – № 10. – DOI: 10.24411/2413-046X-2019-10010. URL: https://qje.su/otraslevaya-i-regionalnaya-ekonomika/moskovskij-ekonomicheskij-zhurnal-10-2019-10/

Kondrat’ev Vladimir
The Role of Critical Raw Materials in US Economy

Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Инновационная гонка [Текст] / В.Б. Кондратьев // Прямые инвестиции. – 2013. – № 6. – С. 32 – 36.

Romashkina Natalia
Russian national security in the context western sanctions and response of the Russian Federation

The Priorities of the Foreign Dual-Use R&D / Pankova L.V., Kazennov S.Yu., eds. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2016. – 236 p.

Danilin Ivan
Влияние кризиса на инновационно-технологическое развитие: провал, прорыв, возможность? // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2020. Т. 225, № 5. С. 201-238. DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-225-5-201-238.

Korsakov Georgiy
U.S. New Anti-Missile Technologies.

Selyanin Yaroslav
The U.S. National Policy in the Area of Artificial Intelligence: Aims, Objectives and Prospects for Realization
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
19/03/2025

On March 19, 2025, a Roundtable on the current state of Russian-American relations was held at the International Multimedia Press Center of the Media Group “Russia Today”.

more...

19/03/2025

The 10th Anniversary “Raisina Dialogue” International Conference on geopolitics and geoeconomics, is being held in New Delhi from March 17-19, 2025, bringing together over 3,500 participants from 125 countries: leaders from politics, business, media and civil society.

more...

Recently Published