![Долгосрочное прогнозирование в США: институциональный аспект [Текст] / С. В. Кислицын // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН. – 2019. – № 2. – С. 23-32. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2019-2-23-32.](/dreamedit/pfoto/9C9A852E_016C_7A69_4709_975B5B3B273D_b.jpg)
Long-Term Forecasting in the US: Institutional Aspect
ISSN 2713-170X
DOI: 10.20542/afij-2019-2-23-32
The article is devoted to the institutional aspects of American forecasting. Most attention is paid to non-governmental scientific organizations. The research is based on materials of leading US organizations and expert interviews. The first part of the study is devoted to the development of predictive researches in the US in 1950-1980. This period was expressed by works of RAND Corporation, World Future Society, Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies, Huston University and others. An increase in the complexity and universality of forecasts has led to further inclusion of representatives from various target audiences. Forecasts have included issues of the social, legal and ethical agenda. More attention was paid to problems of education, employment, and redistribution of resources.The second part of this study is devoted to modern organizations and new methodologies. A current generation of forecasters is represented by the National Intelligence Council and its research “Global Trends”. The Millennium Project is another important organization. It provides an integrated and constantly updated forecast “State of the Future”. Attention is also paid to the Association of professional futurists.At the end of the study, three main conclusions are made. Firstly, an accurate prediction of future trends is not the main forecasting goal. The main task is to create a reasoned view of the future world. Secondly, there is no clear separation between forecasting and foresight which is a further development of predictive research. It uses an interdisciplinary approach and includes current economic, technological and social trends. Thirdly, the attraction of a wide range of experts (including foreign ones) increases the objectivity. This also affects the institutional structure of US organizations. The internationalization of forecasting has a scientific effect and contributes to the credibility of American institutions and the US “soft power”.
The article was prepared at IMEMO within the project of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research No 19-011-31625 “The Main Trends and Risks of Global Political Development: Methodology and Methods of Forecasting Studies”.
Keywords: mid-term forecasting | long-term forecasting | foresight | American think tanks | world development |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Lukashin Yu.
Эконометрика и прогнозирование. М., Московская международная высшая школа бизнеса МИРБИС (Институт), 2010, 66 с. а.л.
Khoros Vladimir
На пути к большой концепции прогнозирования [Текст] / В.Г. Хорос // Экономические стратегии. – 2015. – Т. 17. – № 4 (130). – С. 126 – 133. – Рец. на кн.: Историческое прогнозирование в XXI веке: циклы Кондратьева, эволюционные циклы и перспективы мирового развития. /В.И. Пантин, В.В. Лапкин. – М.: Феникс+ , 2014. – 456 с.
Kharitonova Elena
The Role of Forecasting Studies in the UN Sustainable Development Goals Agenda
Semenenko Irina
Evolutionary cycles and problems of forecasting political changes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No 1. P. 173-178.
Dynkin Alexander
Прогнозирование – это крайне трудная научная задача: интервью [Текст] / А. А. Дынкин // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН. – 2019. – С. 12-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2019-1-12-17.
Alexander Bratersky
Think Tanks during Donald Trump’s Presidency
Bubnova Natalia
«Мозговые центры» как актор современной политики [Текст] = Think tanks as an actor of contemporary politics / Н.И. Бубнова // Сравнительная политика = Sravnitelnaya politika-Comparative politics. – 2017. – Т. 8. – № 3. – С. 8-19.
Voda Kristina
Азиатские «мозговые центры»: положение в мире и влияние на внешнюю политику [Текст] / К.Р. Вода // Сравнительная политика. – 2018. – Т. 9. – № 3. – С. 5-13.
Voda Kristina
Азиатские «мозговые центры»: положение в мире и влияние на внешнюю политику [Текст] = Asian think tanks: global role and impact on foreign policy / К. Р. Вода // Сравнительная политика. – 2018. – Т. 9. – № 3. – С. 5-13. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-3-5-13.
Semenenko Irina
Твои законы в далях лет… Об опыте концептуализации российской политической истории / И.С. Семененко // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2011. – № 6. – С. 7–15.
Lapkin Vladimir , Pantin Vladimir
Историческое прогнозирование в XXI веке: Циклы Кондратьева, эволюционные циклы и перспективы мирового развития. Дубна: Феникс+, 2014, 456 с.
Dynkin Alexander , Primakov Evgeniy
Научные труды вольного экономического общества России. – 2012. – Т. 158. 240 с.
Bahtaraeva Karina
Exchange rate forecasting: forecast accuracy evaluation, key models and forecast centers
Levchenko Anna
Gold Price Forecasts: Majo Price Determinants and Accuracy of the Models
Pantin Vladimir
Studying the Prospects of International Political Developments: Problems of a Methodological Synthesis // Polis Journal.Political Studies, 2012, № 6. P. 27–40.
Lukashin Yu.,
Contemporary approaches to statistical analysis of interrelations and influences. Executive Editor Lukashin Y.P. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, 54 p.
Kupriyanov Alexey
“Китайская угроза” в экспертном дискурсе Индии [Текст] / А. В. Куприянов // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 33-44. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2019-1-33-44.
Alexander Bratersky
Роль «мозговых центров» в выработке политики по расширению НАТО // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2019. Т. 49, № 5. С. 39-54. DOI 10.31857/S032120680004910-5.
Burkova Elena
Ecological modernization, non-governmental organizations and the protection of woods in Russia
Mirkin Yakov
Changes in economic and financial structures: impact of 2020 shocks
Related publications






No comments