The Middle East and the Modern World Order
ISSN 2075-4140
DOI 10.33920/vne-01-2302-02
The article analyzes the role and importance of the countries of the Middle East in the modern world, mentions the historical past of the region as the cradle of several ancient civilizations and three world religions, one of the most important political, economic, religious and cultural centers of our planet. The author notes that for millennia there was a fierce struggle of the so-called pretenders to world domination for influence in the Middle East. External forces in the form of various empires and states failed to subjugate the countries of the Middle East or make them their instruments in foreign policy. In the post-Cold War era, the US has attempted to dominate the Middle East under its concept of a unipolar world. However, the vast majority of countries in the region, primarily the Arab states, preferred to maintain relations with the Russian Federation, began to develop their relations with China, India, and other world and regional powers. Even Washington's allies in the Middle East, represented by Israel and Turkey, retained their sovereignty in foreign policy. Almost all the countries of the region adhere to the line of diversifying their external relations, showing interest in participating in the work of new authoritative independent international organizations such as the SCO and BRICS. The visit of Chinese leader Xi Jinping to Saudi Arabia in December 2022 and his participation in two summits of the Arab states demonstrated the mutual interest of the countries of the region and China in the accelerated development of the entire range of their bilateral and multilateral relations. The author highlights the contrast in the reception of a Chinese guest in Riyadh compared to Joe Biden's rather vague summer 2022 visit to the KSA capital. Washington clearly failed to draw the Arab countries into its foreign policy games. All countries in the region, including Israel and Turkey, chose to take a neutral position with respect to the Ukrainian crisis, and the hydrocarbon exporting countries did not increase their oil and gas production and exports to the world market, despite persistent requests and pressure from Washington. The article concludes that the Middle East prefers to adhere to the model of a polycentric world, where all countries and regions have equal rights and opportunities, including the right to pursue an independent foreign policy.
Keywords: Middle East | world order | Arab countries | region | Saudi Arabia | Israel | Turkey | Iran | Syria | Russia | USA | Middle East settlement | con퓔 | icts | Palestinians | Kurds | multipolar world | terrorism | extremism | security | cooperation |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Ivanov Stanislav
Washington knocks together the pro-American block in the Middle East
Ivanov Stanislav
Joe Biden's visit to the Middle East: losses and gains
Surkov Nikolay
Разрядка в Заливе и курс на Евразию. Ближний Восток превращается в один из новых мировых полюсов // Свободная мысль. 2024. № 1 (1703). С. 85-96. DOI 10.24412/0869-4435-2024-1-85-96.
Frolov Alexander
Администрация Байдена и ближневосточное наследие США // Обозреватель-Observer. 2021. № 5 (376). С. 29-46. DOI 10.48137/2074-2975_2021_5_29.
Ближний Восток: политика и идентичность / под ред. И.Д. Звягельской; ИМЭМО РАН. – М.: Изд-во «Аспект-Пресс», 2020. – 336 с.
Zvyagelskaya Irina, Bogacheva Anastasia, Davydov Alexey, Ibragimov Ibragim, Lazovskii Stanislav, Samarskaia Liudmila, Svistunova Irina, Surkov Nikolay, Tyukaeva Tatiana
Российская политика на Ближнем Востоке: перспективы и вызовы // Свободная мысль. 2021. № 6 (1690). С. 71-85. DOI 10.24412/0869-4435-2021-61690-71-86.
The Middle East: Politics and Identity
Frolov Alexander
Ближний Восток: традиции и трансформации [Текст] / А.В. Фролов, Р. Мустафин // Международная жизнь. – 2014. – № 8. – С. 45 – 62.
Frolov Alexander
Basic points of the US middle east policy
Ivanov Stanislav
Осторожно! Ближний Восток // Новый оборонный заказ. Стратегии. 2024. № 3 (84). С. 31-39.
Ivanov Stanislav
Where does the middle East “Arab spring”? / Ivanov S.M.
Ivanov Stanislav
Rise of the Kurdistan Factor in Regional Geopolitics [Text] / S. Ivanov // World Eсonomy and International Relations. — 2015. — No 10. — P. 84-93
Kamkin Alexander
Middle-Eastern vector of German foreign policy (2010–2022)
Ivanov Stanislav
Вмешательство иностранных государств в сирийский конфликт [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Зарубежное военное обозрение. – 2018. – № 7 (856). – С. 17-23
Ivanov Stanislav
Radical Islamists as a threat of the regional and international security // Diplomatic Service - 2016. – № 5 (68). – P. 38-47
Rustamova Leili
«Сирийский вопрос» в политике ФРГ [Текст] / Л. Р. Рустамова // Вопросы политологии. – 2018. – Т. 8. – № 12(40). – С. 1218–1223.
Bogacheva Anastasia, Ibragimov Ibragim, Kozhanov Nikolay, Lazovskii Stanislav, Svistunova Irina, Surkov Nikolay, Samarskaia Liudmila
The Middle East in the Second Wave of the Coronavirus Crisis. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2020;13(5):158–180. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-10.
Ivanov Stanislav
Судьба советских курдов [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Восток. Афро-Азиатские общества: история и современность. – 2014. – № 6. – С. 54-64.
Ivanov Stanislav
The Kurdish problem as a legacy of the Versailles system of world order
Frolov Alexander
Struggle for Libya: External Actors and Their Bets
Related publications
No comments