Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2019. – Vol. 75. – Issue 4. – P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.
ISSN 0096-3402
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475
Against the background of new US-Russia and US-China political confrontation and the comprehensive crisis surrounding nuclear arms control treaties, there may be little immediate hope for successful talks on the non-weaponization of space. Even so, if and when political preconditions change and serious arms control negotiations resume, the non-militarization of outer space will inevitably return to the disarmament agenda. The United States and Russia, as a minimum, have an obvious common security interest in space – limiting as much as possible the dedicated anti-satellite (ASAT) systems that threaten the satellites that are designed to warn each nation of a ballistic missile attack by any state. A focus on the verifiable ban on the testing of such anti-satellite systems would give the United States and Russia a practical starting point for further negotiations on the non-militarization of space.
This article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation (project ¹18-18-00463 “Prospects of arms control under the effect of new military-political and technological factors”).
Keywords: satellites | anti-satellite weapons | ballistic missile defense | nuclear arms | launch-on-warning | strategic stability | non-weaponization of outer space |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Anichkina Tatiyana
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2015. – V. 71. – Issue 2. – Ð. 17 – 20.
Savel'ev Alexander , Alexandria O.
What Factors Affect Strategic Stability? // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 93-111. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-93-111.
Savel'ev Alexander
Nuclear Deterrence, Strategic Stability, Missile Defence // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 4 (84). P. 10-23. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-4-10-23.
Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.
Anichkina Tatiyana
The future of US-Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control [Text] / T. Anichkina, A. Pezceli, N. Roth // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – Vol. 73. – No 4. – P. 271-278.
Arbatov Alexey
The vicissitudes of Russian missile defense [Text] / À. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2018. – Vol. 74. – Issue 4. – P. 227-237. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486595
Arbatov Alexey
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2016. – Vol. 72. – ¹ 3. – P. 165 – 170.
Arbatova Nadezhda
Domestic Debate in Russia About Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons In: Cotta-Ramusino, P., Lowenthal, M., Maiani, L., Pellecchia, E. (eds) Nuclear Risks and Arms Control - Problems and Progresses in the Time of Pandemics and War. EAC 2022. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 291. Springer, Cham. 2023. P.65-70. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-29708-3_8.
Arbatov Alexey
Global Stability in the Nuclear World // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 3. P. 364-373. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621030023.
Stefanovich Dmitry
Nuclear Posture and Technology Trends in South Asia and Ways Ahead // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 11. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220301.11.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.
Karasev Pavel
Cyber factors of Strategic Stability // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 24-52. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-24-52.
Bogdanov Konstantin, Stefanovich Dmitry
Global Missile Proliferation: Challenges and Solutions // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 4. P. S293–S300. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622100057.
Problems and prospects of Russia – US / NATO cooperation in the sphere of ballistic missile defense. Executive editor: Trubnikov V.I. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 40 p.
Stefanovich Dmitry
Missile Trends in South-East Asia // Íîâûé îáîðîííûé çàêàç. Ñòðàòåãèè. 2022. ¹ 1 (72). P. 71-76.
Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2018. Edited by A. Arbatov, S. Oznobishchev, N. Bubnova. – Moscow: IMEMO, 2019. – 152 p.
Topychkanov Peter
US–Soviet/Russian Dialogue on the Nuclear Weapons Programme of India [Text] / P. V. Topychkanov // Strategic Analysis. – 2018. – Vol. 42. – Issue 3. – P. 251-259 . DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2018.1463958.
Arbatov Alexey
The Hidden Side of the U.S. – Russian Strategic Confrontation [Text] / A. Arbatov // Arms Control Today. – 2016. – Vol. 46. – P. 20 – 24.
The prospects of engaging European nuclear-weapon states in strategic arms control. Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, 94 p.
Arbatov Alexey
Mad Momentum Redux? The Rise and Fall of Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Survival. – 2019. – Vol. 61. – Issue 3. – P. 7-38. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2019.1614785.
Related publications
No comments