Arctic Offshore Oil in Russia: Optimism, Pessimism and Realism // Êîíòóðû ãëîáàëüíûõ òðàíñôîðìàöèé: ïîëèòèêà, ýêîíîìèêà, ïðàâî. 2021. Vol. 14, Special Issue. P. 62-80. DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-86-108.
ISSN 2542-0240
DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-86-108
A strong global interest in the hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic emerged in the mid-2000s, after the US Geological Survey published data on its petroleum potential. While oil prices were growing, an “Arctic optimism” prevailed everywhere, and it was anticipated that a broad-scale oil production in the Arctic would soon begin. At that time, a political aspect dominated in the Russian plans to develop Arctic offshore. Russia intended to prove that it was an energy power capable of establishing a new petroleum province in the Polar seas to replace the aging West Siberia. But later the global energy sector underwent radical changes, and optimism was gradually replaced by realism. The decline of oil prices and introduction of anti-Russian sanctions contributed to the downgrading of the Arctic plans in Russia. Besides, the monopoly of Gazprom and Rosneft on the Arctic shelf hinders the development of its hydrocarbon resources because the state companies do not have sufficient competencies to operate offshore fields on their own. After 2014, Russian oil companies began to revise downwards their plans of oil production in the Arctic seas. Given the sanctions and low oil prices, now relevant ministries also more realistically perceive the prospects of the northern continental shelf development, and their new attitude is clearly visible in their public statements. Thus, they indirectly admit that Russia is not ready yet for environmentally sustainable activities in the Arctic offshore. Actually, many experts and oil companies previously demonstrated a cautious approach to the possibility of the broad-scale oil production in the Polar seas reminding that the potential of the mature Russian oil provinces onshore is still significant. Now, the government makes a strong focus on the onshore alternatives to the Arctic shelf of Russia: the development of hard-torecover reserves, enhanced oil recovery, and support of small and mid-size companies, i.e. the priorities seemingly shift from the extensive to the intensive mode of the sector development. However, pessimistically one can recall that such plans were often made in the past and they remained on paper. Ultimately, broad-scale oil production on the Arctic continental shelf will not begin before 2035. Russian oil and shipping sectors benefit from such time-out, because they receive a chance to train qualified personnel capable of operating on the Arctic shelf with strict adherence to the environmental sustainability principles.
Keywords: Arctic | oil companies | oil production | continental shelf | Rosneft | Gazprom neft | environmental safety | hard-to-recover reserves |
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Starchak Maxim
Armenia’s nuclear industry: threats and challenges [Text] / M. Starchak // Central Asia and the Caucasus. – 2016. – Vol. 17. – ¹ 3. – P. 75 – 87.
Pusenkova Nina
The Rosneftization of the Russian oil sector [Text] / N. Poussenkova // Oxford Energy Forum. – 2016. – Issue 107. – P. 9 – 12.
Todorov Andrey
Russia in maritime areas off Spitsbergen (Svalbard): Is it worth opening the Pandora's Box? // Marine Policy. 2020. DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104264. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X20309106?via%3Dihub#!. Published online: 22.10.2020.
Gudev Pavel
The Sea of Okhotsk: Gain or Giveaway? [Text] / P.A. Gudev // Far Eastern Affairs. – 2016. – Vol. 44. – ¹ 1. – P. 120 – 132.
Kopytin Ivan, Maslennikov Alexander, Sinitsyn Mikhail, Zhukov Stanislav , Zolina Svetlana
Will carbon tax constrain oil production in Ñanada? // Solovev D. (ed.) Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production. FarEastÑon 2018. SIST book series. Springer, Cham. 2020. Vol. 138. Ñ. 793-803. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-15577-3_73.
Nikitina Elena , Pusenkova Nina
Petroleum CSR in Russia: Affordable Luxury or Basic Necessity? [Text] / N. Poussenkova, E. Nikitina // Russian analytical digest. – 2016. – ¹ 181. – P. 3 – 7.
Todorov Andrey
Coping with deficiencies in the Polar Code: a Russian perspective // Polar Journal. 2020. DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799615. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799615?journalCode=rpol20. Published online: 07.09.2020.
Todorov Andrey
Russia’s implementation of the Polar Code on the Northern Sea Route // Polar Journal. 2021. Vol. 11, Issue 1. P. 30-42. DOI 10.1080/2154896X.2021.1911044.
Huntington Henry P., Zagorskii Andrei, Kaltenborn Bjørn P., Hyoung Chul Shin, Dawson J., Lukin M., Dahl P., Peiqing Guo, Thomas D.
Societal implications of a changing Arctic Ocean // Ambio. 2021. DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01601-2. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13280-021-01601-2. Published: 19.07.2021.
Zagorskii Andrei
Konflikt in den Köpfen: Kritik der Versicherheitlichung der Arktis // Osteuropa. 2020. Issue 5. P. 81-98. DOI 10.35998/oe-2020-0031.
Nikitina Elena , , ,
Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses [Text] / Elena Nikitina, Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Angela Arthington, Janos Bogardi // Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. – 2013. – V.5.– Issue 3-4. – Ñ. 341 – 451.
Pusenkova Nina
Arctic Petroleum: Local CSR Perceptions in the Nenets Region of Russia [Text] / N. Pusenkova, J.S.P. Loe, I. Kelman, D.B. Fjartoft // Social Responsibility Journal. – 2017. – Vol. 13. – Issue 2. – Ð. 307-322
Nikitina Elena , Kelman I., Sydnes A.K.
Norway-Russia disaster diplomacy for Svalbard // Safety Science. 2020. Vol. 130, P. 104896. DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104896.
Nikitina Elena
Ñlimate Change in the Arctic: Adaptation to New Challenges. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(4):111-128
Dynkin Alexander
International Cooperation in the Arctic: Risks and Opportunities [Text] / À.À. Dynkin // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2015. – V. 85. – Issue 3. – Ð. 198 – 205.
Grigoriev Mikhail
Development of Transit Potential of the Northern Sea Route // Êîíòóðû ãëîáàëüíûõ òðàíñôîðìàöèé: ïîëèòèêà, ýêîíîìèêà, ïðàâî. 2021. Vol. 14, Special Issue. P. 81-97. DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-109-129.
Pusenkova Nina , Nikitina Elena
Local Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility for Arctic Petroleum in the Barents Region [Text] / N. Poussenkova, El. Nikitina, W. R. Elana, W. Emma, B. F. Daniel // Arctic Review on Law and Politics. – 2016. – Vol. 7. – ¹ 2. – P. 152 – 178.
Trofimova Irina
Countries of BRICS and developing countries in the system of world economic relations: shifts in international capital movement / Trophimova I
Kuznetsov Alexey
Foreign Investments of Russian Companies: Competition with West European and East Asian Multinationals [Text] / A.V. Kuznetsov // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2016. – Vol. 86. – ¹ 2. – P. 77 – 85.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Constructing the Arcto-Pacific: New Challenges and Opportunities // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Issue 4. P. 178-191. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-4-178-191
Related publications







No comments