Zhuravleva Victoria
American presidents in polarized D.C.: From Barack Obama to Joe Biden
Publication Type:
Rubric:


ISSN 2658-6029

DOI: 10.21638/spbu06.2021.305

In 1960 one of the leading researchers of the American Presidency, professor and an adviser to a number of US presidents Richard Neustadt formulated the iconic formula where presidential power needed to cooperate with the Congress — persuade, negotiate and compromise. But since political reality has changed so deeply, today only a God gifted negotiator is able to fulfill its power in polarized Washington, D.C. A modern day president should be a legislator and a showman rolled into one to succeed in his mission. According to the Constitution, the American legislative process is based on the consensus between all participants, while both the President and the Congress have the power of legislative initiative. It is the president who is responsible for gaining this consensus between all the initiators. In time of political polarization parties which traditionally had been the facilitators of this way to compromise became the main obstacles. From the presidential ticket to the Congress, they turned out to be the main headache of the president. Joe Biden came to White House with a reputation of being a skilled compromiser. But while it has been his advantage with the electorate, the left wing of his party strongly opposes his centrist ideology. Donald Trump named himself a brilliant deal maker, but his business experience of making deals appeared to be irrelevant in polarized D.C. Why has it turned out to be so hard to bring a consensus to today’s political process? Will Biden be able to change this trend and reunite the Nation as he promised during his inauguration?


Keywords: polarized political process | divided parties | divided electorate | presidential mandate | the power of bureaucracy | the Progressive Caucus | the Republican Study Committee |

Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Zhuravleva Victoria
Идейно-политические корни американского лидерства [Текст] / В.Ю. Журавлева // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. – 2014. – № 11. – С. 19 – 32.

Bogaevskaya Oksana, Borisova Alexandra , Bunina Anastasia, Gudev Pavel, Davydov Alexey, Desyatsky Ekaterina, Dmitriev Sergey, Zhuravleva Victoria, Kislitsyn Sergey, Kirichenko Elina , Kulakova Vasilisa, Mishin Igor, Chudinova Ksenia
Trump’s Third Year: Ideological Polarization and International Conflicts

Lunev Sergey
Foreign policy of India and the impact of the endogenous factors

Yashlavskii Andrey
Долгое эхо Первой Мировой: Версальско-Вашингтонская система оказалась недолговечной [Текст] / А.Э. Яшлавский // ФСБ: За и Против. – 2014. – № 4(32). – С. 30 – 35.

Bogaevskaya Oksana, Borisova Alexandra , Davydov Alexey, Desyatsky Ekaterina, Dmitriev Sergey, Zhuravleva Victoria, Kislitsyn Sergey, Kulakova Vasilisa, Chudinova Ksenia
Пандемия, протесты, протекционизм и президентские выборы в США в 2020 г. // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН : сетевой журнал. 2021. № 1. С. 31-58. DOI 10.20542/afij-2021-1-31-58. URL: https://www.afjournal.ru/index.php?page_id=411 – Дата публикации: 21.05.2021.

Ivanov Nikolai
Глобализация и проблемы социально-экономического развития России. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2002, 101 с.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Liberal-Conservative Consensus in the Western Countries

Vasil'ev Victor
QUO VADIS, Германия? [Текст] / В.И. Васильев // Международная жизнь. – 2017. – № 2 – С. 107-127.

Pantin Vladimir
Политические размежевания и расколы в современных обществах [Текст] / В. И. Пантин // Южно-Российский журнал социальных наук. – 2019. – Т. 20. – № 3. – С. 28-40. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-3-28-40.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Реквием по старому порядку? / К.С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2012. – № 10. – С. 140–153.

The social component of innovative development

Kvashnin Yuri
Greece Political Crisis: New Parties and Old Ideas / Kvashnin Yury

Peregudov Sergey
Parties and interest groups to a new model of interaction.

Varnavskii Vladimir
Концептуальные проблеразвития инфраструктурного комплекса Сибири и Дальнего Востока / В.Г. Варнавский // Сегодня и завтра российской экономики. – 2011. –мы № 44. – С. 3–12.

Afontsev Sergey
Structural Alternatives of Russia’s Social and Economic Development / A. Shastitko, S. Afontsev, S. Plaksin // Voprosy Economiki . – 2008. – № 1. – P. 71-85.

Lapkin Vladimir , Pantin Vladimir
Russia and Ukraine in a Comparative Perspective: Factors of Sociopolitical Polarization.

Burkova Elena
Религиозная идентичность как фактор политического развития России // Дискурс-Пи. 2021. Т. 18, № 1 (42). С. 91-113. DOI 10.24412/1817-9568-2021-1-91-113.

Komarovskiy Victor
Социально-трудовые исследования. Выпуск X. Социальное партнерство в переходном обществе: опыт России. Под редакцией Комаровского В.В., М., ИМЭМО РАН, 1998, 92 с.

Badaeva Anna
The Pandemic Strategies of the Far-Right Parties in Western Europe. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 13, no 5, pp. 94–113. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-6.

Forecasting Social and Political Processes and Conflicts in the West and in Russia / V.I. Pantin, I.S. Semenenko, V.V. Lapkin, K.G. Kholodkovsky (eds.) – Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2016. – 183 р.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
10/06/2022

The next issue of the journal ME & MO (No. 6, 2022), which opens with a panoramic article by V. Mikheev and S. Lukonin, has been published. The authors dedicated it to China on the eve of the 20th CPC Congress. In the economic block of the magazine special attention is paid to digital currencies.

more...

09/06/2022

An article by Marina Klinova «The State and Energy Security in the World and Europe as a Public Good» was published in the June issue of the journal «Voprosy Ekonomiki» ("Economic Issues") under the heading "International Economics" (in Russian).

more...

Recently Published