Shvydko Vitaly
US-Japan Trade Relations Amid the Globalization Crisis. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2020. Vol 13. No 5. P. 55-77.
Publication Type:

ISSN 2071-8160

DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2020-5-74-55-77

Relations between Japan and the United States have shown significant changes in recent years. Although the main attention has been focused on the strategic and military aspects of these relations, mutual trade and investment, related policies and regulation at-tract more of the attention of the political elites of the two countries.The tensions between the two countries on this issue have a long history. However, they greatly intensified since President D. Trump moved into the White House. The 2019 trade negotiations and the conclusion of a limited trade agreement between the two countries did not result in a comprehensive settlement of conflicting approaches and stands on spe-cific issues. The rising confrontation between the United States and China amid the spread of novel coronavirus epidemic in early 2020 alleviated tensions over Japan-US trade issues by temporarily removing them from the focus of attention of the US presidential administra-tion. Nevertheless, soon they will again become hot issues in the agenda of bilateral rela-tions in the larger context of the US trade policy.In Japan, fears are growing that long-term shifts in the worldview and attitudes of the American political elite pose new threats and create new difficulties for realizing Japan's interests. Of greatest concern is the erosion in the mind of the US elites of the established commitment to further liberalize global and regional international trade and investment through multilateral agreements and institutions. Trump administration’s policy versus main trade partners has shifted towards working out and revising bilateral agreements designed to make American foreign trade more manageable and balanced, and it well may represent part of a long-term change and continue irrespective of the outcome of the US presidential election.The changes that have occurred in Japan-US relations regarding mutual economic ties confirm the general tendency of the international trade and investment system to become more fragmented, shifting from multilateral global and regional platforms to ad hoc agree-ments with clearly defined national goals and priorities.A possible change of political leadership in both countries will not change these processes, which reflect both the characteristic features of the world perception by national elites and the objective interests of influential business groups. At the same time, trade and invest-ment policy is increasingly affected by non-economic factors, mostly “national security” con-siderations. This increases the role of diplomatic maneuvering and other levers and forms of influence in regulating trade and investment flows, and business environment for national and multinational companies.

Keywords: Japan | USA | trade and investment | trade friction | trade agreements | trade and investment regime | multilateral institutions |

Russian Science Citation Index


Zagashvili Vladislav
WTO and mega-regional trade agreements

Shvydko Vitaly, Kliueva Evgenia
Япония и США: сравнительный анализ новых подходов к двусторонним отношениям // Сравнительная политика. 2020. Т. 11, № 1. С. 75-87. DOI 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10006.

Portansky Alexey
About the Prospects of Megaregional Trade Agreements

Zagashvili Vladislav
The World Trade Organization in the face of new challenges

Zagashvili Vladislav
Issues of the Doha WTO Round

Zagashvili Vladislav
Мировая торговля: варианты интеграции [Текст] / В.С. Загашвили // Металлы Евразии. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 6 – 9.

Bragina Elena
Indian-Thai Trade Relations: A View from India. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual'nyye problemy razvitiya, 2022, T. 1, No 1 (54). Pp. 160–167.

Trofimova Olga
Отношения Швейцарии и ЕC: интеграция без вступления [Текст] / О. Е. Трофимова // Международная жизнь. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 155-172.

Desyatsky Ekaterina
The Implementation of Economic and Trade Agreement between the United States and China during the Period of D. Trump and J. Biden Administrations (2020-2022)

Nozdrev Stanislav
Азия: процессы региональной экономической интеграции / С. В. Ноздрев. – DOI 10.24411/2686-7702-2020-10003. – Текст : электронный // Восточная Азия: факты и аналитика : [электронный научный журнал]. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 34-46. – URL: (дата обращения: 14.09.2020).

Nozdrev Stanislav
Economic and regional integration in Asia

Obolenskiy Vladimir
Контуры договоренностей Дохийского раунда и будущая повестка дня ВТО / В.П. Оболенский // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 8–13.

Zagashvili Vladislav
Crisis of the institutional structure of international trade

Obolenskiy Vladimir
Liberalization and protectionism in international trade / Obolensky V.P.

Zagashvili Vladislav
Countertrade: Pros and Cons

Portansky Alexey
Трамп разрушает сложившиеся правила и принципы мировой торговли [Текст] / А. П. Портанский // Международная экономика. – 2018. – № 6. – С. 7-18.

Portansky Alexey
A Long Way from Bretton Woods to Buenos Aires

Rogozhin Alexander
Southeast Asia and Africa – Trade and Investment Relations in the XXIst Century

Zagashvili Vladislav
Regulation of International Trade: Global and Regional Aspects

Chetverikova Anna
Russia-Belarus relations in new political and economic realities
Related publications

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

First news
Institute News

Ivan Zaitsev gave a video lecture as part of the series of programs "Influence of Buddhism on Myanmar Politics" on the YouTube channel "Proshloe: Historical Journal".



On April 12, 2024, the RIAC website published an article by Gleb Makarevich, Junior Research Fellow of the Center of the Indo-Pacific Region, “Sabre Dance: What Goals India and Pakistan Pursue in the South Caucasus”.


Recently Published