Ryabov Andrei
Алгоритмы российской истории // Новое прошлое / The New Past. 2022. № 2. С. 218-225. DOI 10.18522/2500 3224 2022 2-218-225.
Publication Type:


ISSN 2500-3224

DOI 10.18522/2500 3224 2022 2-218-225

The ruptures characteristic of Russian history, accompanied by the breakdown of the former political order, can be explained by two reasons. Monocentric power, which considers its policy to be the only right one, proves incapable of flexibility and adaptability in times of political crisis. At the same time, in Russia the relations between the authorities and groups opposing it have been built not according to the “authorities-opposition” logic, but according to the “authorities-anti-power” one. Cooperation between the two was not possible. They fought a war of annihilation. When the anti-power regime won, it also destroyed the political order associated with the previous regime. Society in Russia was never a driver of political change or an initiator of new political projects. In Pivovarov and Fursov’s terminology, this role was played by “unnecessary people” - groups that found no place in the system of relations between the authorities and society. In the 17th-18th centuries, the role of the “unnecessary” was played by the Cossacks, in 19th-beginning of 20th centuries - by intelligentsia. However, the Cossacks were incorporated by the monarchy into the Russian state system after the suppression of Pugachev uprising. The monarchy began to incorporate the intelligentsia after the 1905-1907 revolution. Under the Bolsheviks, both groups were destroyed over time. Under modern conditions they are not reproducible. The algorithm of Russian history for many centuries resembled the alternation of long periods of dominance of authoritarian power and shorter periods of turmoil and chaos. However, in the long run this algorithm will cease to work, as the possibilities of authoritarian modernization are exhausted.


Keywords: Russia | state | power | civil society | mono-subjectivity | intellectual elite | intelligentsia | Cossacks |

Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Bredikhin A.
Современное казачество в российском политическом процессе [Текст] / А.В. Бредихин // Россия и Запад: диалог культур. – 2017. – № 14. – С. 1-6.

Bardin Andrey
Civil Society in Russia: Experience of Comparative Analysis

Lapkin Vladimir
Russian Society and Power on the Eve of the Elections

Chugrov Sergey , Peregudov Sergey
QUO VADIS? Перспективы становления гражданского общества в России : по мат. конф. /С.В.Чугров, А.Н.Кокарева, С.П. Перегудов [и др.] // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 117–140.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Политология. М., Логос, 2002, 34,7 п.л.

Гражданское общество: западная парадигма и российская действительность. Руководитель авторского коллектива Холодковский К.Г. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 1997, 13 п.л.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Политология. Учебное пособие для СПО. 2-е изд., пер. и доп. – М.: Изд-во Юрайт, 2016. – 213 с.

Гражданское общество: западная парадигма и российская реальность. Руководитель авторского коллектива и главный редактор Холодковский К.Г. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 1996, 10 п.л.

Гражданское общество. Мировой опыт и проблемы России. Ответственный редактор Хорос В.Г. М., Эдиториал УРСС, 1998, 312 с.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Politology. Moscow, Logos Publishers, 2003.


Russian nation-building problems in the context of international experience / Semenenko I.S.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin, Primova E.N.
Политология: учебник. М.: Инфра-М, 2014, 384 с.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Политология. Основной курс. М., Высшее образование, 2006, 29,5 п.л.

Введение в политологию. Ответственный редактор Гаджиев К.С. М., Просвещение, 1995, 272 c.

Kislitsyn Sergey
Модель внешнеполитической идеологии американского неоконсерватизма [Текст] / С. В. Кислицын // Интеллигенция и мир. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 19-42.

Kholodkovskii Kirill
Access to Information as Democratic Institution

Peregudov Sergey
Corporations, Society, the State: Evolution of Relations. Moscow, Nauka Publishers, 2003.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Политология : учебник для академического бакалавриата. 4-е изд. испр. и дополн. М: Юрайт. 2015. - 395 с.

Shlikhter Alexey
Функционирование институтов гражданского общества в системе местного самоуправления США [Текст] / А. А. Шлихтер // Общество и экономика. – 2019. – № 4. – С. 75-86. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760004732-4.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Политология: учебник для вузов. – 6-е изд., перераб. и доп. – Москва: Издательство Юрайт, 2021. – 493 с. – 1000 экз. – ISBN 978-5-534-14338-6.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
17/07/2024

A meeting of the Academic council of IMEMO was hold at the Academician N.N. Inozemtsev conference hall.

more...

10/07/2024

The next issue of the MEMO Journal (No. 7 for 2024) opens with the topical rubric "Security Problems in the Modern World", which features articles by A. Arbatov "The Bearing Structure of Global Security" and A. Krivopalov "The Southern Flank of U.S. Deployment in Eastern Europe".

more...

Recently Published