States of the Middle East in Search of Foreign Policy Identity

572
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-93-103

I. Zvyagelskaya (izvyagelskaya@yandex.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
N. Kozhanov (n_a_kozhanov@mail.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
European University at St. Petersburg, 6/1, Gagarinskaya Str., St. Petersburg, 191187, Russian Federation;
I. Svistunova (isvistunova@imemo.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
N. Surkov (nsurkov@imemo.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation 

Abstract. In the Middle East, the formation of nation-states has not been completed, and a search for foreign policy identity is still underway. The article examines the roots and evolution of foreign policy identity in three major Middle East states – Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia. The authors analyze interaction between the national identities and foreign policy in different cultural contexts and under different political regimes. Turkey, which recalls its Ottoman past, is rapidly returning to the Middle East, challenging other players. Polls demonstrate that a growing share of the Turkish society is confident that Turkey can play an important role in the modern world, serve as a “model” for other states and act independently in the international arena. Tehran is actively pursuing a policy of regional expansion, relying on Shia communities and on its military might, which can eventually lead to a regional hegemony. This policy is based on several identities – revolutionary, pragmatist and pan-Iranian, which do not contradict and even complement each other. Saudi Arabia in the 21st century is positioning itself not only as a leader of the global Muslim, especially Sunni, community, but is also increasingly behaving as a hegemon of the Arab world countering the Iranian expansion. Despite all modernization efforts, the foreign policy identity of the Kingdom is strongly influenced by the tribal mentality of its ruling elite. The research demonstrates that in the Middle East states, foreign policy is strongly influenced by informal institutions – be it a western-type republic, a theocracy or an absolute monarchy. Hence customs, traditions, historical memory have a substantial impact on how the elites and general public envision the role of these countries and that of their rivals.

Keywords: foreign policy, self-positioning, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, foreign policy identity 


REFERENCES

1. Nourt D. Instituty i ekonomicheskii rost: istoricheskoe vvedenie [Institutions and Economic Growth: Historical Introduction]. THESIS, 1993, is. 2, pp. 69-91.

2. Chugrov S.V. Ponyatie vneshnepoliticheskogo mentaliteta i metodologiya ego izucheniya [The Concept of Foreign Policy Mentality and the Methodology of its Studies]. Polis. Political Studies, 2007, ¹ 4, pp. 46-65. DOI:10.17976/jpps/2007.04.04

3. Prokhorenko I.L. Vneshnepoliticheskaya identichnost’ [Foreign Policy Identity]. Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika [Identity: Individuality, Society, Policy]. Semenenko I.S., ed. IMEMO, 2017, pp. 465-468.

4. Kudryashova I.V. Musul’manskaya politicheskaya identichnost’: edinstvo i raznoobrazie [Muslim Political Identity: Unity and Diversity]. Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika [Identity: Individuality, Society, Policy]. Semenenko I.S., ed. IMEMO, 2017, pp. 229-241.

5. Oran B. Turk Dış Politikası: Temel İlkeleri ve Soğuk Savaş Ertesindeki Durumu Uzerine Notlar. Ankara Universitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi, 1996, 51(1), ss. 353-370. [Oran B. Turkish Foreign Policy: Remarks on Basic Principles and Situation after the Cold War. Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Political Science, 1996, no. 51(1), pp. 353-370 (In Turkish)]. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000001913

6. İba S., Ozgoker U. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Turkiye’nin Yeni Dış Politikası. 21. Yuzyılda Cağdaş Turk Dış Politikası ve Diplomasisi. Kocaeli, 2010, ss. 79-102. [İba S., Ozgoker U. International Relations and New Foreign Policy of Turkey. Modern Foreign Policy and Diplomacy of Turkey in the 21st century. Kocaeli, 2010, pp. 79-102 (In Turkish)].

7. Turkiye’nin Girişimci ve İnsani Dış Politikası. [Turkey’s Enterprising and Humanitarian Foreign Policy (In Turkish)] Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/dis-politika-genel.tr.mfajavascript:void(0);/*1567256137704*/ (accessed 01.03.2019).

8. Değerli E.S. Turkiye’nin Balkan Ulkelerine Yakınlaşma Calışmaları: Balkan Paktı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2008, 9(2), ss. 115-134. [Degerli E.S. Turkey’s Efforts to Improve Relations with Balkan Countries: Balkan Pact. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 2008, no. 9(2), pp. 115-134 (In Turkish)].

9. Palabıyık M.S. Sadabad Paktı (8 Temmuz 1937): İttifak Kuramları Acısından Bir İnceleme. Ortadoğu Etutleri, Cilt 2, no. 3, Temmuz 2010, ss. 147-179. [Palabiyik M.S. Sadabad Pact (8 July 1937): An Analysis Based on Alliance Theories. Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, Cilt 2, no. 3, July 2010, ðp. 147-179 (In Turkish)]

10. Ersen E. Geopolitical Codes in Davutoğlu’s Views toward the Middle East. Insight Turkey, Winter 2014, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85-101.

11. Turkiye, Afrika’nın Sesi Olmaya Devam Edecek. 23.01.2017. [Turkey Will Continue to Be the Voice of Africa. 23.01.2017 (In Turkish)]. Available at: https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/70794/turkiye-afrikanin-sesi-olmaya-devam-edecek (accessed 01.03.2019).

12. Resolution of Conflicts and Mediation. Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/resolution-of-conflicts-and-mediation.en.mfa (accessed 15.03.2019).

13. Sanberk O. Turk Dış Politikasının Donuşumu: Oncelikler Nelerdir? Rota Değişikliği Var Mı? 21. Yuzyılda Cağdaş Turk Dış Politikası ve Diplomasisi. Kocaeli, 2010, ss. 103-113. [Sanberk O. Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: What are the priorities? Is there change of direction? Modern Foreign Policy and Diplomacy of Turkey in the 21-st century. Kocaeli, 2010, pp. 103-113 (In Turkish)]

14. Yeşiltaş M., Balcı A. A Dictionary of Turkish Foreign Policy in the AKP Era: A Conceptual Map. SAM Papers, no. 7. Ankara, May 2013. 35 p.

15. Erşen E. Geopolitical Codes in Davutoğlu’s Views toward the Middle East. Insight Turkey, Winter 2014, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85-101.

16. Davutoğlu A. Stratejik Derinlik: Turkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. İstanbul, 2010. 585 s. [Davutoglu A. Stategic Depth: International Position of Turkey. İstanbul, 2010. 585 p. (In Turkish)]

17. Svistunova I.A. Blizhnii Vostok vo vneshnei politike Turtsii v XXI v.: regionalnaya strategiya [Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East in the XXI century: regional strategy]. Problemy natsionalnoi strategii, 2012, no. 4, pp. 39-55.

18. Erken A. Re-Imagining the Ottoman Past in Turkish Politics: Past and Present. Insight Turkey, Summer 2013, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 171-188.

19. Cavuşoglu M. 2019 Yılına Girerken Cumhurbaşkanlığı Hukumet Sisteminde Girişimci ve İnsani Dış Politikamız. Ankara, 17 Aralık 2018. [Cavusoglu M. Turkey’s Enterprising and Humanitarian Foreign Policy within the Presidetial System at the Threshold of the 21-st Century. Ankara, 17.12.2018. (In Turkish)]. Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/site_media/html/2019-yilina-girerken-girisimci-ve-insani-dis-politikamiz.pdf (accessed 01.03.2019).

20. Kanat K.B. Theorizing the Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy. Insight Turkey, Winter 2014, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 65-84.

21. Kohen S. Dış politikada 2017: Atak Yılı. 29.12.2017. [Kohen S. Year 2017 in Foreign Policy: the Year of Atack. 29.12.2017 (In Turkish)] Available at: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/yazarlar/sami-kohen/dis-politikada-2017-atak-yili-2581476/ (accessed 27.02.2019).

22. Kohen S. Dış politikada 2018: Atılım Yılı. 28.12.2018. [Kohen S. Year 2018 in Foreign Policy: the Year of Break Through. 28.12.2018. (In Turkish)] Available at: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/yazarlar/sami-kohen/dis-politikada-2018-atilimyili-2802382/ (accessed 27.02.2019).

23. Aydın M. Turk Dış Politikası Kamuoyu Algıları Araştırması. Istanbul, 2018. 44 s. [Aydin M. Research of Public Opinion in Turkey’s Foreign Policy. Istanbul, 2018. 44 p. (In Turkish)] Available at: http://ctrs.khas.edu.tr/sources/TDP-2018.pdf (accessed 28.02.2019).

24. Al-e Akhmad Dzh. Westoxification. Tehran, 1962. 189 p. (In Persian)

25. Reznikov A. B. Iran: padenie shakhskogo rezhima [Iran: the Fall of Shah Regime]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1983. 163 p.

26. Ushakov V.A. Vneshnyaya politika Islamskoi Respubliki Iran posle revolyutsii 1978–1979 [Foreign Policy of Islamic Republic Iran after the Revolution of 1978–1979]. Dr. Diss. (Hist.) Moscow, 1997. 542 p.

27. Khomeini R. Governance of the Jurist. Tehran, n/a., 112 p. (In Persian)

28. Motovilov Yu. Osobennosti vyrabotki I osushchestvleniya regional’ noipolitiki Islamskoi Respubliki Iran v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Specific Aspects of Development and Implementation of the Foreign Policy of Islamic Republic of Iran in the Conditions of Globalizations]. Diss. Cand. (Polit.) Nizhnii Novgorod, Nizhegorodskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet, 2005. 271 p.

29. Khomeini R. Last Political Will. Tehran, 1369. 50 p. (In Persian)

30. Khatami M. Islam, dialog i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo [Islam, Dialogue and Civil Society]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2001. 240 p.

31. Moulana Kh. Mokhammadi M. Foreign Policy of Islamic Republic Iran during Ahmadinejad. Tehran, Nashr-e dodgostar, 1387. 250 p. (In Persian)

32. Akbarzadeh Sh., Barry J. State Identity in Iranian Foreign Policy. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 2016, ¹ 43:4, pp. 613-629. DOI:10.1080/13530194.2016.1159541

33. Slavin B. Iran and Al Qaeda More Enemies than Allies. Al-Monitor, 8 February 2013. Available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2012/al-monitor/iran-and-al-qaedabr-more-enemies.html (accessed 07.03.2019).

34. Khamenei S. A. Announcements during Meeting with Members of Council of Experts. Khamenei.Ir, 04.09.2014 (In Persian) Available at: http://farsi.khamenei.ir/speech-content?id=27356 (accessed 07.03.2019).

35. Nevo Joseph. Religion and National Identity in Saudi Arabia. Middle Eastern Studies, 1998, vol. 34, no. 3. pp. 34-53. DOI:10.1080/00263209808701231

36. Hinnebusch R., Anoushiravan E. The Foreign Policies of Middle East States. Boulder, Colo, 2002. 381 p.

37. Gasiorowski M., Yom S. The Government and Politics of the Middle East and North Africa. New York, 2017. 578 p. DOI:10.4324/9780429494482

38. Bin-Faisal al-Saud, Turki. Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Policy. Middle East policy, 2013 20(4), pp. 37-44. DOI:10.1111/mepo.12044

39. Bin-Salman bin-Abdulaziz, Mohammed. Our Vision: Saudi Arabia the heart of the Arab and Islamic worlds, the investment powerhouse, and the hub connecting three continents. Available at: https://vision2030.gov.sa/en/foreword (accessed 2 March 2019). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Zvyagelskaya I., Kozhanov N., Svistunova I., Surkov N. States of the Middle East in Search of Foreign Policy Identity. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2019, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 93-103. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-93-103



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 3
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Bretton Woods 2.0: Towards a New Global Financial Architecture
  • Transformation of the EU Political Party System on the Eve of the 2024 European Election
  • South Asia in Regional and World Politics
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.