Stumbling Stones in The Way of WTO Reformation

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-8-13-20
V. Obolenskiy (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Science, 32, Nakhimovskii Prosp., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation


The increasing number of the WTO member states expresses dissatisfaction with the results of the performance of the organization. Within the last quarter of century the legal structure of the WTO remains practically unchanged and it does not allow to regulate on the multilateral level those areas related to trade that go beyond the formally established competence of the organization. The main reasons for the WTO’s weak response to the challenges of the time lie in the preservation of the order of its decision-making by consensus despite of a fundamental change in the balance of power in the world trade and the organization itself in favor of developing countries. The greatest complaints regarding the current activities of the WTO are caused by the functioning of its dispute resolution mechanism including the Appellate body, the insufficient level of transparency of the member countries’ trade policies, the fulfillment of their obligations to notify trade-related regulatory measures, the use of “unfair” trade practices. In the light of these claims, individual countries have worked out initial proposals for WTO reformation that could serve as a starting point for further substantive discussions. It has also become clear that the WTO is no more coping with its basic negotiating function. To date, agreement has been reached on only one item of the extensive program of negotiations of the Doha Round, which already lasts for eighteen years. In this situation, the WTO is moving away from the enough successful negotiation practices of the GATT. It came to the understanding of the inevitability of shifting the focus from the adoption of binding multilateral agreements for all members to the preparation of agreements with a limited number of participants interested in liberalization in a particular direction of trade. As a result of the change in the approach to the negotiation process, the system of regulation of international trade will acquire a three-layer configuration more and more. Its foundation will remain the multilateral agreements of the Uruguay Round of the GATT; the second layer will be open for accession new multilateral agreements of the WTO. The third layer will be formed by the bilateral and multilateral RTAs, the regulatory rules of which go beyond the formal competence of the WTO. A destructive position towards the WTO is taken by the United States, whose actions cannot be regarded as anything other than the desire to dismantle the multilateral trading system and to return to the regulation of foreign economic relations on a bilateral basis, as it was before the creation of the GATT in 1947. It is obvious that the continuation of the current trade policy by the United States will complicate the harmonization of the measures that are so much needed for reformation of the WTO.


international trade, balance of power, WTO, principle of decision-making, dispute resolution, transparency of trade policy, “unfair” trade practices, negotiation agenda, United States


1. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 20.03.2019).

2. Declaration of G20 leaders. December 1, 2018 (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 20.03.2019).

3. Spartak A.N. Sovremennye transformacionnye processy v mezhdunarodnoi torgovle i interesy Rossii [Actual transformation processes in international trade and interests of Russia]. Moscow, 2018. 456 p.

4. Obolenskiy V.P. Ot legitimnogo protekcionizma k torgovym voinam? [From legitimate protectionism to trade wars?]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 18-25. DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-18-25

5. UNCTADSTAT. Merchandise: Total Trade and Share, Annual. 1948–2018. Available at: (accessed 22.03.2019).

6. UNCTADSTAT. Services (BPM6): Exports and Imports of Total Services, Value, Shares, and Growth, Annual, 2005–2017. Available at: (accessed 22.03.2019).

7. Dyumulen I.I. Vsemirnaya torgovaya organizatsiya. Economika, politika, pravo [World Trade Organization. Economics, politics, law]. Moscow, VAVT, 2012. 360 p.

8. Convention establishing the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 25.03.2019).

9. Monitoring of the actual events in the field of the international trade, no. 17. Moscow, VAVT, 27.09.2018 (In Russ.) Available at:$file/Monitoring_17.pdf (accessed 30.09.2018).

10. Dispute Settlement. Available at: (accessed 26.03.2019).

11. Foreign trade encylopedia. Moscow, Economica, 2011. 447 p. (In Russ.)

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Obolenskiy V. Stumbling Stones in The Way of WTO Reformation . Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, No 8, pp. 13-20.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2020, vol. 64, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • eijing’s Pain Points
  • International Role of Euro and European Integration
  • Sources and Trends of Japanese International Relations Theories
  • New Dimensions of Identity Politics: Contested Memories in History Museums of the 20th Century
View This Issue (2020, vol. 64, No. 5)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“The Common Spaces”. The XX century was marked by the process of active development of the so-called common spaces, namely the World ocean, outer space and the Internet which, due to various reasons, were previously perceived as peripheral for the mankind and were not used at all or less intensively. Since then, the degree of their development and usage is constantly increasing. Even though the prospects of obtaining material dividends from their use are often extremely remote, the level of competition there is steadily increasing, resulting in growing inter-state conflicts’ potential.

“Silk Road and prospects of Great Eurasia”. It is planned to publish materials concerning the Chinese project of Silk Road and its impact on the socio-economic development of various countries in Eurasia and the integration processes in this mega-region.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
                     Articles by year
                     Authors by year
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial