Edgar D. Tovar-Garcia (firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com),
Universidad Panamericana, Escuela de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales, Prolongacion Calzada Circunvalacion Poniente 49, Zapopan, Jalisco, 45010, Mexico
The paper studies how export performance is influenced by export composition. The empirical literature claims that higher shares of high technology exports is positively linked to total exports, because they are high added value goods and the demand is inelastic. Subsequently, the composition of exports matters in explaining export performance. This research tested the association between exports of crude petroleum and natural gas and total exports in a bilateral framework for the Russian case. Oil and gas are key Russian export products, and it is well known that the demand for these products is inelastic. Accordingly, using dynamic panel data models it was found that a higher share of crude petroleum and natural gas in total exports is positively related to total bilateral exports. However, this effect is mainly a result of indirect effects of export composition on income and price elasticities. This finding can lead to a better understanding of the Russian persistent surplus in both trade and current accounts and of the most appropriate policies for managing external imbalances.
export composition; export performance; external imbalance; crude petroleum and natural gas; Russia
1. Aristovnik A. Short-Term Determinants of Current Account Deficits: Evidence from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Eastern European Economics, 2008, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 24-42. DOI:10.2753/EEE0012-8775460102
2. Aristovnik A. Are Current Account Deficits in Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union Too High? Transformations in Business & Economics, 2007, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32-53.
3. Gu X., Zhou Z.-Y., Beg A.B.M.R.A. What Determines China’s Trade Balance Dynamics: a Disaggregate Analysis of Panel Data. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2014, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 353-368. DOI:10.1080/13547860.2014.880284
4. Brissimis S.N., Hondroyiannis G., Papazoglou C., Tsaveas N.T., Vasardani M. A. The Determinants of Current Account Imbalances in the Euro Area: a Panel Estimation Approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 2013, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 299-319. DOI:10.1007/s10644-012-9129-0
5. Carrasco C.A., Serrano F. Global and European Imbalances and the Crisis: a Critical Review. The Demise of Financedominated Capitalism. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015, pp. 265-288. DOI:10.4337/9781784715076.00013
6. Wierts P., Van Kerkhoff H., De Haan J. Composition of Exports and Export Performance of Eurozone Countries. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2014, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 928-941. DOI:10.1111/jcms.12114
7. Stanley D.L., Bunnag S. A New Look at the Benefits of Diversification: Lessons from Central America. Applied Economics, 2001, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1369-1383. DOI:10.1080/00036840010007498
8. Dawe D. A New Look at the Effects of Export Instability on Investment and Growth. World Development, 1996, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1905-1914. DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00080-0
9. Alwang J., Siegel, P. B. Portfolio Models and Planning for Export Diversification: Malawi, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. The Journal of Development Studies, 1994, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 405-422. DOI:10.1080/00220389408422321
10. Love J. Trade Concentration and Export Instability. The Journal of Development Studies, 1979, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 60-69. DOI:10.1080/00220387908421726
11. Khan M.Z.S., Hossain M. I. Determinants of Trade Balance of Bangladesh: a Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. Bangladesh Development Studies, 2012, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 45-65. Available at: http://bids.org.bd/uploads/publication/BDS/35/35-2/02_Determinants of Trade.pdf (accessed 12.12.2017).
12. Arellano M., Bond S. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 1991, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 277-297. Available at: http://restud.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/2/277.short (accessed 12.12.2017).
13. Blundell R., Bond S. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 1998, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 115-143. DOI:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
14. Blundell R., Bond S., Windmeijer F. Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models: Improving on the Performance of the Standard GMM Estimator. Advances in Econometrics, 2001, vol. 15, pp. 53-91. DOI:10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15003-0
15. Bun M.J.G., Windmeijer F. The Weak Instrument Problem of the System GMM Estimator in Dynamic Panel Data Models. The Econometrics Journal, 2010, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 95-126. DOI:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2009.00299.x
16. Roodman D. A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2009, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 135-158. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
17. Celik S., Kaya H. Real Exchange Rates and Bilateral Trade Dynamics of Turkey: Panel Cointegration Approach. Applied Economics Letters, 2010, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 791-795. DOI:10.1080/13504850802388993
18. Bineau Y. Real Exchange Rate and Bilateral Trade Balance of Cambodia: a Panel Investigation. Economics Bulletin, 2016, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 895-900.
19. Bruno G.S.F. Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Unbalanced Panel-Data Models with a Small Number of Individuals. Stata Journal, 2005, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 473-500. Available at: http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0091 (accessed 12.12.2017).
20. Navoi A. V. Ustoichivost’ balansov mezhdunarodnykh raschetov kak vazhneishaya predposylka finansovoi stabil’nosti (Sustainability of external balances as an important precondition for financial stability. In Russ.). Den’gi i kredit, 2017, no. 6, pp. 66-72. Available at: https://www.cbr.ru/publ/MoneyAndCredit/navoy_06_17.pdf (accessed 12.12.2017).
Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX