Eastern Partnership: Trade Integration of the EU Target Countries

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-86-97

I. Gurova (igurova@mail.ru),
MGIMO University, 76, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation 


The former Soviet republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, for which the EU established the Eastern Partnership program, are involved in the orbit of the EU and the EAEU integration processes. The concept of integration competition suggests that the EU and Russia, which is the dominant power in the EAEU, should be considered as rivals in this matter. Six target countries found themselves in a situation of integration choice, which in some cases can manifest itself in the form of an integration dilemma that does not leave the third path. Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine have already signed Association Agreements/DCFTA with the EU, while Belarus and Armenia are members of the EAEU. The indicators of economic dependence, trade integration and asymmetry in trade demonstrate that the trade and economic priorities of these countries are changing. Trade and economic relations with the EU and with Russia are asymmetric, which is due to a significant gap in the scale of the economy. Moreover, the more partners trade, the deeper the asymmetry. The least dependent on both Russia and the EU is Georgia. With a fairly high level of trade integration with the EU, the country has a diversified geographic structure of trade and actively trades with third countries. Economic dependence and trade integration of Moldova and Ukraine with the EU has increased significantly due to the reduction of ties with Russia. In this case, the integration choice is a dilemma, as one powerful partner displaces the other partner. In Armenia, which accessed the EAEU, on the contrary, Russia ousts the EU. Belarus avoided the integration dilemma. Having the most open economy, the country simultaneously increases trade with Russia, the EU and third countries. The article is aimed at developing the trade and economic aspect of the concept of integration competition and overcoming the fatalism of the “dilemma of integration”. 


EU, Russia, Eastern Partnership, economic dependency, asymmetry in trade, import share in GDP 


1. EU Eastern Partnership (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.euneighbours.eu/ru (accessed 14.05.2017).

2. Eastern Partnership. Platform 2 “Economic Integration and Convergence with EU Policies”. Work Programme 2014–2017. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/platform_2_work_programme_2014-2017_0.pdf (accessed 14.05.2017).

3. Vinokurov E., Libman A. Dve evraziiskie integratsii [Two Integration Processes in Eurasia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2013, no. 2, pp. 47-72.

4. Gurova I.P. O mnogomernoi modeli evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi integratsii [Multidimensional Model of the Eurasian Economic Integration]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, 2016, no. 1, pp. 14-29. DOI:10.14530/se.2016.1.014-029

5. Golovnin M. Yu., Zakharov A.V., Ushkalova D.I. Ekonomicheskaya integratsiya: uroki dlya postsovetskogo prostranstva [Economic Integration: Lessons for the Post-Soviet Space]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2016, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 61-69.

6. Golovnin M. Yu. Rossiya i integratsionnye ob”edineniya stran “poyasa sosedstva” [System Integration Projects in Russia in the “Neighborhood Zone”]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik, 2012, no. 11, pp. 10-24.

7. Glinkina S.P. Konkurentsiya integratsionnykh proektov na postsovetskom prostranstve [Competition between Integration Projects in Post-Soviet Space]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2013, no. 12, pp. 65-79.

8. Spartak A.N., Vinokurov E. Ju., Kulik S.A., Chernyshev S.V., Jurgens I. Ju. Konflikt dvukh integratsii [Conflict between Two Integrations]. Moscow, Econ-Inform Publ., 2015. 241 p.

9. Vasfilov D.S. Sistemnyi analiz vzaimodeistviya Rossii i Evropeiskogo soyuza na postsovetskom prostranstve [Systems Analysis of Interaction between Russia and the European Union in the Post-Soviet space]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii, 2014, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 31-46.

10. Skriba A.S. Vyzovy i perspektivy evraziiskoi integratsii posle ukrainskogo krizisa [Challenges of Eurasian Integration after the Ukrainian Crisis]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii, 2014, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 96-111.

11. EU and Russia: Before and Beyond the Crisis in Ukraine: House of Lords Paper 115 Session 2014-15 (House of Lords Session 2014-15). Published by the Authority of the House of Lords. February 2015. Available at: https://www.publications.parliament.uk (accessed 14.05.2017).

12. Durdyeva, A.A. Dilemma integratsii na evraziiskom prostranstve v kontekste ukrainskih sobytii [Integration Dilemma within the Eurasian Space in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 2015, no. 3 (42), pp. 134-140.

13. Kharlamova G. The European Union and the Eastern Partnership: Convergence of Economies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, no. 27, pp. 29-41. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00968-5

14. Glinkina S.P., Kulikova N.V. Strany Tsentral’no-Vostochnoi Evropy v Evropeiskom soyuze: sostoitsya li konvergentsiya? [Central and East European Countries in the European Union: Will Convergence Take Place?]. Belorusskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 2015, no. 2, pp. 24-32.

15. Crescenzi M.J. Economic Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, 2002. 276 p.

16. X Russian International Studies Association Convention “25 Years of Russia’s Foreign Policy”. Section 8.1. Russia in the World Economic System. Moscow, MGIMO, December 8–9, 2016 (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.risa.ru/ru/sections/274-8-1 (accessed 12.08.2017).

17. Single Market Scoreboard. Integration and Market Openness. Trade in Goods and Services (Reporting Period: 2013–2014) European Commission (2016). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/single-market-scoreboard (accessed 14.05.2017).

18. UNCTADStat. Available at: http://unctadstat.unctad.org (accessed 14.05.2017).

19. World Development Indicators. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed 01.08.2017).

20. Gurova I.P., Efremova M.V. Vnutriotraslevaya i mezhotraslevaya torgovlya SNG [Intra-Industry and Inter-Industry Trade in the CIS Region]. Evraziiskaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya, 2012, no. 3 (16), pp. 30-39.

21. Dragneva R., Wolczuk K. Between Dependence and Integration: Ukraine’s Relations with Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 2016, vol. 68, iss. 4, pp. 678-698. DOI:10.1080/09668136.2016.1173200

22. Olarua S. The Strategy and the Reasons of the Republic of Moldova’s Association with European Union. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, no. 16, pp. 381-390. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00817-X

23. Evaluation of the Impact of the Free Trade Agreement on Sustainable Development in Order to Support the DCFTA Negotiations between the EU and the Republic of Moldova. Technical Interim Report. Variant of the Project. Customer: European Commission – Directorate General for Trade. Rotterdam, April 14, 2012 (In Russ.) Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/february/tradoc_150565.pdf (accessed 14.05.2017).

24. Spartak A.N. Napravleniya i stsenarii vzaimodeistviya Rossii i Belarusi v formate Soyuznogo gosudarstva [Fields and Scenarios of Russia and Belarus Interaction in the Framework of the Union State]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2016, no. 3, pp. 126-157.

25. Vinokurov E. Eurasian Economic Union: Current State and Preliminary Results. Russian Journal of Economics, 2017, no. 3, pp. 54-70. DOI:10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.004

26. Bayramov V. Considering Accession to the Eurasian Economic Union: for Azerbaijan, Disadvantages Outweigh Advantages. Available at: http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/CAD-51-52-14-16.pdf (accessed 14.05.2017). 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Gurova I. Eastern Partnership: Trade Integration of the EU Target Countries. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, No 3, pp. 86-97. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-86-97

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2020, vol. 64, No. 7
Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • Drivers of Global Economy
  • D. Trump’s Economic Model: Results and Prospects
  • European Union: Second Generation Trade Agreements
  • USA–Iran: between “Maximum Pressure” and “Heroic Flexibility”
  • Protest Potential of the Latin America: Regional Aspect of Global Phenomenon
View This Issue (2020, vol. 64, No. 7)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“The Common Spaces”. The XX century was marked by the process of active development of the so-called common spaces, namely the World ocean, outer space and the Internet which, due to various reasons, were previously perceived as peripheral for the mankind and were not used at all or less intensively. Since then, the degree of their development and usage is constantly increasing. Even though the prospects of obtaining material dividends from their use are often extremely remote, the level of competition there is steadily increasing, resulting in growing inter-state conflicts’ potential.

“Silk Road and prospects of Great Eurasia”. It is planned to publish materials concerning the Chinese project of Silk Road and its impact on the socio-economic development of various countries in Eurasia and the integration processes in this mega-region.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
                     Articles by year
                     Authors by year
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial