Challenges to Green Finance in G20 Countries

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-10-16-24

O. Bogacheva (,
Financial Research Institute, 3/2, Nastasinskiy Per., Moscow, 127006, Russian Federation;
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
O. Smorodinov (,
Financial Research Institute, 3/2, Nastas’inskii Per., Moscow, 127006, Russian Federation 


Financial support for transition to sustainable social and economic development is one of the major challenges for most of G20 countries. To complete this task, key stakeholders have to overcome multiple barriers. According to international experts, several challenges are recognized as top priorities. Without addressing them G20 countries might not succeed in bridging the increasing financial gap between the needs of green economy and currently available investment opportunities. Such challenges are analyzed in the article. Among them are: 1) absence of common definition of green finance and lack of international standards; 2) insufficient correlation of targets of sustainable growth with priorities of national investment policy; 3) absence of regulatory and legal framework directly related to green finance; 4) ecological externalities; 5) maturity mismatch; 6) poor green project selection and management; 7) information asymmetry at the capital markets; 8) lack of analytical tools and expertise in identification and assessment of green projects’ risks. The authors explain how each of the considered challenges hampers realization of green financing potential and analyze the best practice in addressing them. It is stated that solution of the abovementioned problems requires strong support from the governments of the G20 countries. At present, these countries implement such measures, as: introduction of appropriate regulatory and legal framework, stimulation of development market mechanisms and instruments of green financing (green bonds, credits, indices, etc.), formation of conditions aimed at elimination of asymmetry of information, fostering private-public partnership. Development of new international standards aligned with the requirements of sustainable growth and green financing is also under way in G20 countries. It is also noted that several challenges (namely, environmental externalities and green projects’ risk evaluation) require additional efforts from G20 countries, both at the national and global levels. 


green financing, Group of Twenty (G20), investments, risk analysis, green bonds, sustainable development 


1. McKinsey Global Institute. Bridging Global Infrastructure Gaps. McKisey&Company, June 2016. 60 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2017).

2. McKinsey Global Institute. Infrastructure Productivity: How to Save $1 Trillion a Year. McKisey&Company, January 2013. 100 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2017).

3. Dobbs R., Mischke Ja. Kak sekonomit' trillion dollarov v god [How to Save Trillion Dollars a Year]. Vestnik McKinsey, 2013, no. 28, pp. 78-89.

4. G20 Green Finance Study Group, G20 Green Finance Synthesis Report. 15 July 2016. Available at: (accessed 02.03.2017).

5. OECD Policy Guidance for Investment in Clean Energy Infrastructure. Expanding Access to Clean Energy for Green Growth and Development. An OECD Report to the G20, with Contributions by the World Bank and UNDP. Paris, OECD Publishing, October 2013. 69 p. Available at: (accessed 02.03.2017).

6. Bobylev S., Perelet R., eds. Ustoichivoe razvitie v Rossii [Sustainable Growth in Russia]. Berlin, St.-Petersburg, Russko-nemetskoe byuro ekologicheskoi informatsii, 2013. 224 p. Available at: (accessed 10.03.2017).

7. Porfir'ev B. “Zelenye” tendentsii v mirovoi finansovoi sisteme [Green Trends in the Global Financial System]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2016, no. 9, pp. 5-16.

8. Della Croce R., Kaminker C., Stewart F. The Role of Pension Funds in Financing Green Growth Initiatives. OECD Publishing, 2011. Available at: (accessed 19.02.2017).

9. Inderst G., Kaminker C., Stewart F. Defining and Measuring Green Investments: Implications for Institutional Investors’ Asset Allocation. OECD Working papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, 2012, no. 24. Available at: (accessed 19.02.2017).

10. Towards a Green Investment Policy Framework. OECD Environment Working Papers no. 48. Available at: (accessed 19.02.2017).

11. The World Bank. Inclusive Green Growth. The Pathway to Sustainable Development, 2012. Available at: (accessed 11.03.2017).

12. Establishing China’s Green Financial System. Final Report of the Green Finance Task Force, April, 2015. 56 p. Available at: (accessed 17.02.2017).

13. ICMA. Green Bonds Principles, 2015. Available at: (accessed 12.01.2017).

14. Climate Bonds Initiative. Climate Bonds Standard. Version 2.1. Available at: (accessed 14.03.2017).

15. Climate Bonds Initiative. Scaling up Bond Markets for Sustainable Development. A Strategic Guide for the Public Sector to Stimulate Private Sector Market Development for Green Bonds. Consultation Paper. July 2015. Available at: (accessed 16.02.2017).

16. The Sustainable Energy and Economic Network. Available at: (accessed 11.03.2017).

17. Green Bond Cornerstone Fund Programme. Environmental and Social Management System. Environmental and Social Policy and Procedures. Draft. Washington, IFC, updated August 23, 2016. 10 p.

18. The Centre for Policy Development and Future Business Council. Climate Change and Directors’ Duties. Memorandum of Opinion. October 7, 2016. Available at: (accessed 11.03.2017).

19. World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2017. Available at: (accessed 16.03.2017). 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Bogachyova O., Smorodinov O. Challenges to Green Finance in G20 Countries. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, vol. 61, No 10, pp. 16-24.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“The Common Spaces”. The XX century was marked by the process of active development of the so-called common spaces, namely the World ocean, outer space and the Internet which, due to various reasons, were previously perceived as peripheral for the mankind and were not used at all or less intensively. Since then, the degree of their development and usage is constantly increasing. Even though the prospects of obtaining material dividends from their use are often extremely remote, the level of competition there is steadily increasing, resulting in growing inter-state conflicts’ potential.

“Silk Road and prospects of Great Eurasia”. It is planned to publish materials concerning the Chinese project of Silk Road and its impact on the socio-economic development of various countries in Eurasia and the integration processes in this mega-region.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
                     Articles by year
                     Authors by year
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial