The Trump Factor and the Changing Face of Globalization

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-7-5-14

P. Yakovlev (, 
Institute of Latin American Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 21/16, B. Ordynka Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation; 
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36, Stremyannyi Per., Moscow 115054, Russian Federation 


Rapid ascent of Donald Trump to the top of the American power pyramid seriously alarmed business and political establishments in most states of Europe, Latin America and other regions. The explanation is obvious: in the course of the election campaign and after the election, the new American leader made a lot of hard and uncompromising statements, and then, having settled down in the White House, took a number of concrete steps against trade, economic and sociopolitical interests of a series of countries. In essence, Washington’ actions pour oil on the flame of global instability and uncertainty, and can complicate the process of overcoming problems of the entire world community in time of crisis, generated by both internal causes of individual countries and international effects. The central question of the future global order is which policies will become the world center of gravity: formation of a cooperation strategy of integration, alliances and multilateral agreements, or a course on isolationism and protectionism, financial-economic pressure, “cold” trade and currency wars. Taking the path of frankly revisionist style policies, Donald Trump showed himself an opponent to the global economic agenda that had seemed unshakable and indicated the direction of further movement for the entire international community until recently. Contrary to what was argued by numerous experts and politicians, President Trump does not believe the United States is the main beneficiary of globalization, which Washington himself imposed on the rest of the world some time ago. The American President regards other countries as winners in an all-out international competition: China, Germany, Mexico, etc. The U.S. are by no means on the top of this list, and Trump intends to change the status quo and implement a geo-economical script appropriate to his views of the world. “The Trump Factor” becomes the key element in the process of transformation of the prevailing globalization image. 


globalization, the presidency of D. Trump, protectionism, NAFTA, Mexico, integration mega blocks, China, the European Union 


1. Yakovlev P.P. Global’naya ekonomika: pryzhok v neizvestnost’ [Global Economy: a Leap into the Unknown]. Perspektivy, 2016, no. 3, pp. 99-115.

2. Rodrick D. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York, Norton & Company, 2011. 288 p.

3. Dani Rodrik’s. The Globalization Paradox. Available at: (accessed 07.01.2017).

4. ITC. Trade Map. Trade Statistics for International Business Development. Available at: SelServiceCountry_TS.aspx (accessed 11.02.2017).

5. Yakovlev P.P. Prezidentstvo B. Obamy: predvaritel’nye itogi [Obama’s Presidency: a Preliminary Report. Perspektivy, 2016, no. 3, pp. 5-18.

6. Kahhat F. Comercio internacional: .suma cero o cero compresion? Available at: (accessed 17.01.2017).

7. James H. The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2002. 272 p.

8. Globalization has Acquired a Bitter Aftertaste. Available at: (accessed 16.01.2017).

9. Mexico lamenta la decision de Ford de cancelar multimillonaria inversion. Available at: (accessed 05.02.2017).

10. Fiat Chrysler podria finalizar su produccion en Mexico si Trump aprueba aranceles muy altos. Available at: (accessed 15.02.2017).

11. Otero Iglesias M. Futuros escenarios “trumpistas”. Expansion (Madrid), 10.11.2016.

12. ITC. Trade Statistics for International Business Development. Available at: (accessed 12.01.2017).

13. Greely B., Welch D., Weinstein A. Trump Threatens to Undo Nafta’s Auto Alley. Available at: (accessed 10.02.2017).

14. Empresarios de Mexico y EE.UU. abogan por la mantencion del Tlcan. Available at: (accessed 11.02.2017).

15. Luhnow D., Schlesinger J.M. Mexico Teeters Between Its Recent U.S. Friendship and 170 Years of Hostility. The Wall Street Journal, 05.02.2017.

16. Mexico: Pena Nieto responde a las amenazas de Trump. Available at: (accessed 15.01.2017).

17. Mexico se une frente a las politicas de Trump. Available at: (accessed 13.02.2017).

18. Alda S. Quien pierde con Trump: America Latina o Estados Unidos? Available at: (accessed 13.02.2017).

19. Office of the United States Trade Representative. TPP Full Text. Available at: (accessed 05.09.2016).

20. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. 2016 Leaders’ Declaration. Lima, Peru. Available at: (accessed 10.12.2016).

21. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. Free Trade Agreements / Regional Agreements. Available at: (accessed 12.01.2017).

22. ue C.E. Las grandes potencias economicas amenazan con unirse para aislar a Trump. El Pais (Madrid), 19.11.2016.

23. Asia-Pacifico se moviliza ante el proteccionismo de Trump. Cinco Dias (Madrid), 20.11.2016.

24. President Trump Takes Action: Signs Series of Presidential Memoranda Dealing with Trade and Other Issues. Available at: (accessed 27.01.2017).

25. China Premier Li Keqiang: Economic Openness Serves Everyone Better. Available at: (accessed 12.02.2017).

26. Diego Larrouy, Alvaro Bayon. El proteccionismo de Trump abre la puerta a un nuevo orden comercial. Cinco Dias, 25.01.2017.

27. Ortega A. Europa no esta preparada para Trump. Available at: (accessed 20.12.2016).

28. Higgott R. TPP and TTIP in Comparative Context: What Can Europe Learn? Available at: (accessed: 02.02.2017).

29. French PM Opposes TTIP as Being Against ‘EU Interests’. Available at: (accessed 08.02.2017).

30. Bradshaw J. What’s the Difference between TTIP and TPP and Why does Donald Trump Want them Scrapped? The Telegraph, 22.11.2016.

31. ITC. Trade Map. Trade Statistics for International Business Development. Available at: (accessed 12.02.2017).

32. Vidal-Folch X. Volvemos al capitalismo de casino. El Pais, 09.02.2017.

33. Solana: “La presidencia de Trump es un paso atras para el mundo”. El Pais, 10.02.2017. 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Yakovlev P. The Trump Factor and the Changing Face of Globalization. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, vol. 61, No 7, pp. 5-14.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“The Common Spaces”. The XX century was marked by the process of active development of the so-called common spaces, namely the World ocean, outer space and the Internet which, due to various reasons, were previously perceived as peripheral for the mankind and were not used at all or less intensively. Since then, the degree of their development and usage is constantly increasing. Even though the prospects of obtaining material dividends from their use are often extremely remote, the level of competition there is steadily increasing, resulting in growing inter-state conflicts’ potential.

“Silk Road and prospects of Great Eurasia”. It is planned to publish materials concerning the Chinese project of Silk Road and its impact on the socio-economic development of various countries in Eurasia and the integration processes in this mega-region.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
                     Articles by year
                     Authors by year
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial