American Pirates versus Large Corporations and State Agencies

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-10-73-82

T. Rovinskaya, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation (


The article presents the second part of the research on the American Pirate Parties political practice. It deals with political activity of the United States Pirate Party and Pirate Parties of particular states, focused on preservation of the basic democratic values (liberty of speech and free information exchange, personal privacy, government transparency and responsibility) in the following forms: protest actions against national legislation and international agreements violating civil rights; promotion of laws protecting civil rights in the digital space; creation of alternative computer networks independent from state agencies and large corporations. By contrast with European Pirate Parties which have managed to achieve a significant presence in local, national and regional legislative bodies (including the European Parliament) within the decade from 2006 till today, the American "pirates" have failed to obtain an official registration at the national level during the same period of time, and have only had temporary or local success. This is accounted for far more complicated political conditions of their efforts to overcome much stronger economic lobbies and a political bias in the government. American Pirate Parties in association with civil rights organizations and IT-companies are permanently fighting consecutive bills (COICA, PIPA, SOPA, CISPA, CISA) attempting to restrict civil rights of Internet users in favor of copyright holders and information market lobbies, which leads to legalization of state censorship and surveillance. Moreover, there are state surveillance programs like PRISM and international agreements (ACTA, TPP) secretly brought into action, which also pose a challenge to civil rights and democratic values protection. As long as these threats exist, a necessity to restore social justice will continue to persist, especially in the information field, where the freedom of Internet serves as a crucial indicator for democracy itself.


1. Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015). 

2. Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015).

3. Proposed US ACTA Plurilateral Intellectual Property Trade Agreement (2007). Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015).

4. ACTA Taskforce Agenda. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015).

5. S. 3804 (111th): Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015). 

6. COICA Internet Censorship Bill Is Back. Help Fight It! Pirate Party, 16.11.2010. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015).

7. Meet Ron Wyden. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015).

8. Copyright Law of the United States. Available at: (accessed 23.11.2015). 

9. 105th United States Congress. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, DMCA (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 20.11.2015). 

10. Text of the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011. Available at: (accessed 21.11.2015). 

11. McCullagh D. Senate Bill Amounts to Death Penalty for Web Sites. C/Net, 12.05.2011. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2015).  

12. Bill Summary & Status. 112th Congress (2011–2012). H.R.3261 CRS Summary. Available: (accessed 24.11.2015). 

13. Internet Goes on Strike. Available at: (accessed 20.11.2015).

14. Poulter S. Wikipedia Protest Hits Home: U.S. Senators Withdraw Support for Anti-Piracy Bills as 4.5 Million Sign Petition. The Daily Mail, 19.01.2012. Available at: (accessed 24.11.2015). 

15. Blocked (Shutdown)/Anonymous Hacked Universal Music and Other Sites. Available at: (accessed 24.11.2015). 

16. Weisman J. After an Online Firestorm, Congress Shelves Antipiracy Bills. The New York Times, 20.01.2012. Available at: (accessed 20.11.2015).

17. Samuels J. An Alternative to SOPA: An Open Process Befitting an Open Internet. Electronic Frontier Foundation, December 8, 2011. Available at: (accessed 25.11.2015).

18. H.R.234 – Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act. Available at: (accessed 01.12.2015).

19. Couts A. New CISPA Amendments Expected – but the Fight Will Go On. Digital Trends, 10.04.2012. Available at: (accessed 01.12.2015). 

20. O'Harrow R. Jr., Nakashima E., Gellman B. U.S., Company Officials: Internet Surveillance Does Not Indiscriminately Mine Data. The Washington Post, 08.06.2013. Available at: (accessed 25.11.2015).

21. Ball J., Rushe D. NSA Prism Program Taps in to User Data of Apple, Google and Others. The Guardian, 06.06.2013. Available at: (accessed 25.11.2015). 

22. Release: United States Pirate Party Condemns Government Spying; Demands NSA Deliver Transparency, Phone Records. Pirate Party, 08.06.2013. Available at: (accessed 26.11.2015).

23. Florida Pirate Party. June 25, 2013. Available at: (accessed 27.11.2015). 

24. S.754 – Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015. Available at: (accessed 30.11.2015).

25. Cybersecurity Information and Sharing Act (CISA) Passes. Pirate Party, 07.11.2015. Available at: (accessed 03.12.2015).

26. Tarasenko P. USA povyshayut svoyu kiberbezopasnost' [The USA Improve Their Cybersecurity]., 28.10.2015. Available at: (accessed 03.12.2015).

27. Samofalova O. USA sozdali krupneishii antikitaiskii soyuz [The USA Have Created the Largest Anti-China Union]. Vzglyad, 05.10.2015. Available at: (accessed 05.12.2015).  

28. Katasonov V. Proekt gegemonii USA pod prikrytiem partnerstva [The USA Supremacy Project under the Cover of Partnership]. Strategic Culture Foundation. 07.10.2015. Available at: (accessed 05.12.2015).

29. Final TPP Text Confirms Worst Fears: Shadowy Agreement Poses a Grave Threat to the Internet and Freedom of Expression. Fight for the Future, November 5, 2015. Available at: (accessed 06.12.2015).

30. Greer E. The Clock Is Ticking on a Time Bomb that Could Blow up a Free Internet: the TPP. The Guardian, 06.11.2015. Available at: (accessed 06.12.2015).

31. Sterbenz C. The US Pirate Party Is Working on a Way to Get around the NSA's Surveillance. Business Insider, 14.06.2013. Available at: (accessed 13.10.2015). 

32. Community Broadband Networks. Institute for Local Self-Reliance. Available at: (12.10.2015). 

33. USPP Applauds FCC Rules on Net Neutrality and Community Broadband. Pirate Party, 26.02.2015. Available at: (accessed 12.10.2015).



globalization, United States Pirate Party, international Pirate Party Movement, freedom of speech and information exchange, personal privacy, government transparency, protest campaigns, ACTA, COICA, PIPA, SOPA, OPEN, PRISM, CISPA, CISA, TPP 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Rovinskaya T. American Pirates versus Large Corporations and State Agencies. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2016, vol. 60, No 10, pp. 73-82.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“The Common Spaces”. The XX century was marked by the process of active development of the so-called common spaces, namely the World ocean, outer space and the Internet which, due to various reasons, were previously perceived as peripheral for the mankind and were not used at all or less intensively. Since then, the degree of their development and usage is constantly increasing. Even though the prospects of obtaining material dividends from their use are often extremely remote, the level of competition there is steadily increasing, resulting in growing inter-state conflicts’ potential.

“Silk Road and prospects of Great Eurasia”. It is planned to publish materials concerning the Chinese project of Silk Road and its impact on the socio-economic development of various countries in Eurasia and the integration processes in this mega-region.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
                     Articles by year
                     Authors by year
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial