The South European Welfare State in the New Millennium: Constraints, Challenges and Prospects for Europeanisation

737
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-7-25-36

R. Mulé, University of Bologna, Via dei Bersaglieri 6, 40124, Bologna, Italy (rosa.mule@unibo.it



Abstract

The development of the South European welfare state has raised several questions regarding the transformation and viability of its defining features in the new millennium. Where do the incentives for change come from? What are the obstacles and opportunities for change? The key issues concern the stability of welfare institutions, the resilience of welfare policy legacies, such as familialism, and the constellation of actors involved in the processes of continuity and change. This article examines the challenges faced by the South European welfare state and argues that after the global economic crisis of 2007–2011 South European countries continue to share the main characteristic of very weak welfare capitalism, although Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain have undertaken divergent paths to cope with the political economy of austerity. In addition, the article suggests that prospects for Europeanization are dwarfed by the fact that national actors use EU constraints and opportunities in the field of social policy either to strengthen their legitimization, amplify their room for manoeuvre or expand their power. Hence policy reforms reflect the timing, the constellation of actors and the political and social conflicts that prevail in each country. By ‘bringing politics back in’ this article departs from mainstream research on South European welfare policy change where institutions are typically anthropomorphised and treated as coherent actors in the policy process. The article contributes to the literature by offering a sounder explanation that includes the role of political entrepreneurs as a crucial analytical aspect in understanding variations in welfare state patterns in Southern Europe.


Keywords

South European, welfare state, familialism, poverty risk, Great Recession, Europeanization 


REFERENCES

1. Gal J. Exploring the Extended Family of Mediterranean Welfare States, or: Did Beveridge and Bismarck take a Mediterranean Cruise Together? Ajzenstadt M. and Gal J., eds. Children, Gender and Families in Mediterranean Welfare States. New York, Spinger, 2010, pp. 77-101.

2. Ferrera M. The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 1996,vol. 6, pp. 17-37.

3. Ferrera M. The South European Countries. Castles F., Leibfried S., Lewis J., Obinger H., Pierson C., eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 616-629.

4. Petmesidou M. and Guillén A.M. Can the Welfare State as We Know It Survive? A View from the Crisis-Ridden Southern European Periphery. South European Society and Politics, 2014,vol. 19, pp. 295-307.

5. Moreno L. The Model of Social Protection in Southern Europe. Enduring characteristics? Revue Francaise des Affaires Sociales, 2006,vol. 1, pp. 73-95.

6. Gutiérez R. Welfare Performance in Southern Europe: Employment Crisis and Poverty Risk. South European Society and Politics, 2014,vol.19, pp. 371-392.

7. León M. and Migliavacca M. Italy and Spain: Still the Case of Familistic Welfare Models? Population Review, 2013, vol. 52, pp. 25-42.

8. Naldini M. and Jurado T. Family and Welfare State Reorientation in Spain and Inertia in Italy from a European Perspective. Population Review, 2013, vol. 52, pp. 43-61.

9. Valiente C. The Erosion of “familism” in the Spanish Welfare State: Childcare Policies since 1975. Ajzenstadt M. and Gal J., eds. Children, Gender and Families in Mediterranean Welfare States.New York, Spinger, 2010, pp. 129-142.

10. León M., Pavolini E. and Guillén A.M. Welfare Rescaling in Italy and Spain: Political Strategies to Deal With Harsh Austerity. European Journal of Social Security, 2014, vol. 17, pp. 182-201.

11. Costa G. Long-Term Care Italian Policies: A Case of Inertial Institutional Change. Ranci C. and Pavolini E., eds. Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts. New York, Springer, 2013, pp. 221-241.

12. Bettio F., Simonazzi A. and Villa P. Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: the ‘Care Drain’ in the Mediterranean. Journal of European Social Policy, 2006, vol. 16, pp. 271-286.

13. Fargion V. Le politiche per la non-autosufficienza. Fargion V. and Gualmini E., eds. Tra l’Incudine e il Martello.

Regioni e nuovi rischi sociali in tempo di crisi . Bologna, Il Mulino, 2013, pp. 37-71.

14. Karamessini M. Continuity and Change in the South European Social Model. International Labour Review, 2008, vol. 147, pp. 43-70.

15. Confalonieri M.A. and Canale L. Le Politiche di Conciliazione Famiglia-Lavoro. Fargion V. and Gualmini E., eds. Tra l’Incudine e il Martello. Regioni e nuovi rischi sociali in tempo di crisi. Bologna, Il Mulino, 2013, pp. 103-132.

16. Lewis J. Work/Family Reconciliation, Equal Opportunities, and Social Policies. Interpretation of Policy Trajectories at the EU Level and the Meaning of Gender Equality. Journal of European Public Policy, 2006, vol. 13, pp. 420-437.

17. Saraceno C. and Keck W. Towards an Integrated Approach for the Analysis of Gender Equity in Policies Supporting Paid Work and Care Responsibilities. Demographic Research, 2011, vol. 25, pp. 371-406. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.11

18. Ferreira L.V. Persistent Poverty: Portugal and the Southern European Welfare Regime. European Societies, 2008, vol. 10, pp. 49-71.

19. Ferrera M., ed. Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe. Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. London, Routledge, 2005. 258 p.

20. Guillén A.M. and Léon M., eds. The Spanish Welfare State in European Context. Farham, Ashgate, 2011. 338 p.

21. Matsaganis M. and Leventi C. The Distributional Impact of Austerity and the Recession in Southern Europe. Southern European Society and Politics, 2014, vol. 19, pp. 393-412.

22. Fargion V. and Gualmini E., eds. Tra l’Incudine e il Martello. Regioni e nuovi rischi sociali in tempo di crisi. Bologna, Il Mulino, 2013. 280 p.

23. Carrera L.N., Angelaki M., Carolo D. Political Competition and Societal Veto Players: The Politics of Pension Reform in Southern Europe. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 5-31.

24. Sakellaropoulos T. and Angelaki M. The Politics of Pension Reform in South European Welfare States. Van Langendock J., ed. The Right to Social Security. Antwerpen-Oxford-New York, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 121-144.

25. Petmesidou M. and Papatheodorou C. Poverty and Social Deprivation in the Mediterranean. Trends, policies and welfare prospects in the new Millennium. International Social Science Council, Zed Books, 2006. 432 p.

26. Petmesidou M. and Glatzer M. The Crisis Imperative, Reform Dynamics and Rescaling in Greece and Portugal. European Journal of Social Security, 2015, vol. 17, pp. 157-180.

27. Zartaloudis S. The Impact of the Fiscal Crisis on Greek and Portuguese Welfare States: Retrenchment before the Catch-up? Social Policy and Administration, 2014, vol. 48, pp. 430-449. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12069

28. Mahoney J. and Thelen K., eds. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015. 322 p.

29. Pierson P. Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004. 196 p.

30. Rixen T. and Viola L.A. Putting Path Dependence in Its Place: toward a Taxonomy of Institutional Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2015, vol. 27, pp. 301-323.

31. Pavolini E., León M., Guillén A. M. and Ascoli U. From Austerity to Permanent Strain? The EU and Welfare State Reform in Italy and Spain. Comparative European Politics, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 1-21.

32. Hemerijck A. Two or Three Waves of Welfare State Transformation? Morel N., Palier B. and Palme J.,eds. Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol, The Policy Press, 2012, pp. 191-205.

33. Ascoli U. Comment on Anton Hemerijck/1: Retrenchment Policies and the Deficit of Social Europe. Sociologica, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 1-5. DOI/10.2383/36888

34. Streeck W. and Thelen K., eds. Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005. 290 p.

35. Guillén A.M. and Pestmesidou M. The Public-Private Mix in Southern Europe: What Changed in the Last Decade. Seeleib-Kaiser M., ed. Welfare State Transformations: Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, pp. 56-78.

36. Hall P.A. and Thelen K. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Hanké B., ed. Debating Varieties of Capitalism. A Reader. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 251-272.

37. Mulé R. La Genesi degli Ammortizzatori Sociali in Deroga: la Prospettiva del Policy Change. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 2013, vol. 8, pp. 343-364.

38. Mulé R. Coping with the Economic Crisis. The Regional Governance of Emergency Social Shock Absorbers. Paper Presented at Espanet-Italy, University of Salerno, 18-20 September 2015.

39. Bonoli G. and Natali D., eds. The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. 342 p.

40. Häusermann Silja. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. 300 p.

41. Graziano P., Jacquot S. and Palier B., eds. The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 333 p.

42. Ferrera M. and Rhodes M., eds. Recasting European Welfare States. Frank Cass, London, 2000. 302 p.

43. Kvist J. and Saari J., eds. The Europeanization of Social Protection. Bristol, Policy Press, 2007. 308 p.

44. Pasquier R. and Radaelli C.M. ‘Conceptual Issues’. Graziano P. and Vin M., eds. Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, pp. 34-45.

45. Zeitlin J. and Pochet P., eds. The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment Strategy and Social Inclusion Strategies. Brussels, Peter Lang, 2005. 511 p.

46. Sotiropoulos D.A. Usages of ‘Europe’ in Welfare Policies in Greece, 1981-2010. Graziano P., Jacquot S. and Palier B., eds. The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 121-147.

47. Sakellaropoulos T. Greece: the Quest for National Welfare Expansion Through More Social Europe. Kvist J. and Saari J., eds. The Europeanization of Social Protection. Bristol, Policy Press, 2007, pp. 211-228.

48. Graziano P. and Jessoula M. ‘Eppur si muoveva…’ The Italian Trajectory of Recent Welfare Reforms: From ‘Rescued by Europe’ to Euro-scepticism. Graziano P., Jacquot S. and Palier B., eds. The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 148-174.

49. Jessoula M. La politica pensionistica. Bologna, Il Mulino, 2009. 351 p.

50. Sacchi S. Italy, Between Indifference, Exploitation and the Construction of the National Interest. Kvist J. and Saari J., eds. The Europeanization of Social Protection. Bristol, Policy Press, 2007, pp. 77-97.

51. Zartaloudis S. A Compass or a Spear? The Partisan Usage of Europe in Portuguese Employment-Friendly Reforms. Graziano P., Jacquot S. and Palier B., eds. The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 175-200.

52. Guillén A.M., González B.S., Moreno-Manzana-ro G.N. De-constructing the Familist Welfare State in Spain. Towards Reconciliation Through Europe? European Journal of Social Security, 2011, vol. 13, pp. 89-105.

53. Theodoropoulou S. National Social and Labour Market Policy Reforms in the Shadow of EU Bail-Out Conditionality: The Cases of Greece and Portugal. Comparative European Politics, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 29-55.

 


Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Mulé R. The South European Welfare State in the New Millennium: Constraints, Challenges and Prospects for Europeanisation. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2016, vol. 60, No 7, pp. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-7-25-36



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed
 
Current Issue
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).

NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“The Common Spaces”. The XX century was marked by the process of active development of the so-called common spaces, namely the World ocean, outer space and the Internet which, due to various reasons, were previously perceived as peripheral for the mankind and were not used at all or less intensively. Since then, the degree of their development and usage is constantly increasing. Even though the prospects of obtaining material dividends from their use are often extremely remote, the level of competition there is steadily increasing, resulting in growing inter-state conflicts’ potential.

“Silk Road and prospects of Great Eurasia”. It is planned to publish materials concerning the Chinese project of Silk Road and its impact on the socio-economic development of various countries in Eurasia and the integration processes in this mega-region.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

CONTEST!

"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE JOURNAL

The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
WORLD ECONOMY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
                     Full
                     Subjects
                     Authors
                     Articles by year
                     Authors by year
Years
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial