Capitalism is Ending, but "Prehistory" is Not?

27
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-10-112-122
L. Fishman, lfishman@yandex.ru
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16, S. Kovalevskoi Str., Ekaterinburg, 620137, Russian Federation.

Received 31.05.2022. Revised 16.06.2022. Accepted 13.07.2022.

Abstract. This article attempts to answer the question: is the description of Modernity in terms of “capitalism” justified? The author shows that during the history of the 20th‑21st centuries, the pictures of capitalism drawn by theorists got more and more atypical elements. Among these are the theories of imperialism, dependent development, a single industrial society, and especially the world-system analysis. Also noteworthy is the description “modern” applied to the societies of this period. A situation has arisen where many phenomena fit into the concept of “capitalism”, or “capitalism with numerous prefixes”. Thus, “capitalism” in various guises becomes “too much”. Eventually, capitalism itself has come down to the universal phenomena of violence, inequality and exploitation. The productivity of discussing modernity in a paradigm revolving around the notion of “capitalism” is becoming less and less obvious. Too wide range of practices has become associated with “capitalism with prefixes”, which forced a number of researchers to refuse to identify modernity with capitalism in favor of various concepts based on retro-metaphors (“neo-feudalism”). Numerous concepts of “post-capitalism” have also emerged. The author substantiates that at the theory layer, the difference between the types of what is still interpreted as “capitalism” or already as “post-capitalism” does not have a qualitative character. Of all the aforesaid, the marxian concept of human “prehistory” becomes relevant as a more universal paradigmatic frame for comprehending modern trends. Therefore, the concept of communism will still remain a worldview horizon that gives a meaning to this “prehistory”. In a situation where capitalism ends, but “prehistory” does not, this will make it possible to single out social relations that determine the “prehistory” nature by themselves, and not through the prism of denouncing or apologizing (which is “capitalism” initially) of their political discourses.

Keywords: capitalism, socialism, post-capitalism, “human prehistory”, Marxism


REFERENCES

1. Fishman L.G. The Origins of the Democracy (“God” of the War Machine). Ekaterinburg, UrO RAN, 2011. 264 p. (In Russ.)

2. Streeck W. Buying Time: the delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. Economic Sociology, 2019, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 86-103. (In Russ.)

3. Pokrovskii N.E. The convergence theory: classical foundations and modern problems. Sociological Studies, 1994, no. 5, pp. 34-41. (In Russ.)

4. Eisenstadt S.N. Multiple modernities in an age of globalization. Department of sociology and anthropology at the Truman Research Institute. The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1998. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ayzenshtadt-sh-n-mnozhestvennost-modernizmov-v-vek-globalizatsii/viewer (accessed 05.05.2022).

5. Shcherbak S. Demodernization or internal tensions of modernity? Ideology and Politics, 2018, no. 1, pp. 45-46. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.ideopol.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/__________2018%201.%204.%20Rus.%20Scherbak.%20Demodernization%20Ed.pdf (accessed 05.05.2022).

6. Beugelsdijk Sj., Maseland R. Culture in economic science: history, methodological reasoning and areas of practical application in modern times. Moscow, SPb., Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara, Izd-vo “Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya”, Fakul’tet svobodnykh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU, 2016. 464 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kanarsh G.Yu. Modern capitalism: factors of transformation. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2021, no. 1, pp. 83-97. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2021.1.6

8. Afanasov N.B. Spare time as a new form of labor: digital professions and capitalism. Galaktika media: zhurnal media issledovanii, 2019, no. 1, pp. 43-61. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24411/2658-7734-2019-00002

9. Pavlov A. Free Money in a Mousetrap of Surveillance Capitalism: Basic Income and Social Theory. Russian Sociological Review, 2020, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 198-224. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X‑2020-2-198-224

10. Chernyaeva N.A. The industry of childhood and post-Fordization of parenting and the family sphere in Russia. Post-Fordism: concepts, institutions, practices. Il’chenko M.S., Mart’yanov V.S., eds. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2015, pp. 238-259. (In Russ.)

11. Banks M. “Being in the Zone” of Cultural Work. Culture Unbound, 2014, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 241-263. DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146241

12. Roggero G. The General Illumination Which Bathes all the Colours: Class Composition and Cognitive Capitalism for Dummies. Culture Unbound, 2014, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 113-125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1461

13. Procenko N. I look at human intelligence with pessimism, but with optimism – at volitional action”. In memory of the historical sociologist Richard Lachman. Gor’kii, 28.09.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://gorky.media/context/ya-s-pessimizmom-smotryu-na-lyudskoj-intellekt-no-s-optimizmom-na-volevoe-dejstvie/?utm_source=vk.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=o-knigah-vydayuschegosya-amerikanskogo-istor&utm_content=55041553 (accessed 17.11.2021).

14. Kobrin K. It got worse, but there is hope. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2020, no. 4 (132), pp. 327-340. (In Russ.) Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2020/4/stalo-huzhe-no-est-nadezhda.html (accessed 17.11.2021).

15. Din D. Communism or neo-feudalism? Logos, 2019, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 103-104. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kommunizm-ili-neofeodalizm/viewer (accessed 17.11.2021).

16. Varoufakis Y. The Seven Secrets of 2020. Project Syndicate, 28.12.2020. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/seven-secrets-revealed-by-2020-by-yanis-varoufakis-2020-12 (accessed 17.11.2021).

17. Kotkin J. The Coming of Neo-Feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class. New York, Encounter Books, 2020. 274 p.

18. Katasonov V. Inclusive capitalism as an ideology. Russkii lad, 19.01.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rus-lad.ru/news/v-katasonov-inklyuzivnyy-kapitalizm-kak-ideologiya/ (accessed 17.11.2021).

19. Anarchy Collective+. Returning to the definition of capitalism: “structural capitalism”. Egalite, 24.05.2021, pp. 86-98. (In Russ.) Available at: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?url=ya-disk-public%3A%2F%2FD7I8nWfOXjjSwuxBDO4FlLb34gUYLEEk9sf9iDbnIkM2zqcD8vHOMurO8x%2FXx6yLq%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D&name=Egalite_Preodolevaya_kapitalizm.pdf (accessed 17.11.2021).

20. Pavlov A.V. Socio-philosophical perspectives of an unconditional basic income. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2020, no. 3. pp. 105-118. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-3-105-117

21. Palmer T.G., ed. The Morality of Capitalism: What Your Professors Won’t Tell You. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2012. 138 ð. (In Russ.)

22. Phelps E. Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara, 2015. (In Russ.) Available at: https://liberal.ru/wp-content/uploads/legacy/files/articles/6840/Phelps%20OnLine.pdf (accessed 17.11.2021).

23. Davydov D.A. Post-capitalism and the birth of personalities. Moscow, RIPOL klassik, 2021. 336 p. (In Russ.)

24. Ritzer G. Modern Sociological Theory. SPb., Piter, 2002. 688 p. (In Russ.)

25. Fishman L.G. Post-capitalism and last (dys)topia of our time. Politeia, 2020, no. 2, pp. 40-53. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-97-2-40-53

26. Pluckrose H., Lindsay J. Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity – and Why This Harms Everybody. Durham, Pitchstone Publishing, 2020. Available at: https://www.rulit.me/data/programs/resources/pdf/Plakrouz_Cynical-Theories_RuLit_Me_688928.pdf (accessed 17.11.2021).

27. Fisher M. Capitalist Realism. Moscow, Ul’trakul’tura 2.0, 2010. (In Russ.) Available at: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/%D0%A4/fisher-mark/kapitalisticheskij-realizm (accessed 17.11.2021).

28. Lachmann R. Capitalists in Spite of Themselves: Elite Conflict and Economic Transitions in Early Modern Europe. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego, 2010. 512 p. (In Russ.)

29. Marx K. Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Das Kapital. Vol. 3. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1951. 932 p. (In Russ.)

30. Lenin V.I. What are “friends of the people” and how do they fight against the Social Democrats? Lenin V. I. Complete works. Vol. 1. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1967, pp. 125-346. (In Russ.)

31. Lenin V.I. The agrarian question in Russia by the end of the XIX century. Complete works. Vol. 17. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1968, pp. 57-137. (In Russ.)

32. Lenin V.I. On the issue of workers’ deputies in the Duma and their declaration. Complete works. Vol. 22. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1969, pp. 202-207. (In Russ.)

33. Naumova E.I., Sokolov E.G. Formation of the concept of “Capitalism”. Discourse, 2018, no. 4, pp. 30-44. (In Russ.) Available at: https://discourse.etu.ru/assets/files/naumova-e.i.-sokolov-e.g.pdf (accessed 17.11.2021).

34. Rosanvallon P. Utopian capitalism. History of the Idea of the market. Mîñêâà, NLO, 2007. 256 ð. (In Russ.)

35. Marx K., Engels F. Communist Manifesto. Works. Vol. 4. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1955, pp. 419-459. (In Russ.)

36. Marx K. Forms preceding capitalist production. Works. Vol. 46. Ch. I. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1968, pp. 461-508. (In Russ.)

37. Lyubutin K.N., Kondrashov P.N. Socio-philosophical foundations of the periodization of history in the concept of K. Marx. Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 2007, no. 4, pp. 51-67. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-filosofskie-osnovaniya-periodizatsii-istorii-i-kontseptsii-k-marksa/viewer (accessed 17.11.2021).

38. Marks K. To the criticism of political economy. Works. Vol. 13. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1959, pp. 1-167. (In Russ.)

39. Romanovskii N.V. Marx Remains a Greatest Figure in Contemporary Sociology. Sociological Studies, 2018, no. 5, pp. 74-83. (In Russ.)

40. Greber D. On the phenomenon of bullshit jobs. Fragments of anarchist anthropology. Moscow, Radikal’naya teoriya i praktika, 2014, pp. 150-156. (In Russ.)

41. Fishman L.G., Mart’yanov V.S., Davydov D.A. Rental society: in the shadow of labor, capital and democracy. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2019. 44 p. (In Russ.) 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Fishman L. Capitalism is Ending, but "Prehistory" is Not?. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 112-122. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-10-112-122



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 3
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Bretton Woods 2.0: Towards a New Global Financial Architecture
  • Transformation of the EU Political Party System on the Eve of the 2024 European Election
  • South Asia in Regional and World Politics
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.