Russian-Turkish Relations after 2015: New Trends, Old Dilemmas

72
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-11-88-96
S. Sherstyukov, ssherstyukov@hse.ru
 National Research University Higher School of Economics, 17, Malaya Ordynka Str., Moscow, 119017, Russian Federation.
 N. Bodishteanu ORCID 0000-0001-7113-029X, nbodishteanu@hse.ru
 National Research University Higher School of Economics, 17, Malaya Ordynka Str., Moscow, 119017, Russian Federation.

Received 05.04.2021.

Acknowledgements. Published with the financial support of the project “The influence of the policy of Iran and Turkey on transformation of the Middle East and Post-Soviet space” of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs of HSE-University.


Abstract. As the events of the past few years indicate, relations between Russia and Turkey are increasingly determined by security-related issues. Such a shift in priorities in bilateral relations should be perceived not only as a response to the emerging threats to the internal and external security of the two countries but also as a consequence of the changes in the strategic orientation of Russia and Turkey after the end of the Cold War. The most important events in the formation of a new model of relations between Russia and Turkey were such as the “Arab Spring”, the wars in Syria and Libya, US support for the Syrian Kurds from the “People’s Self-Defense Forces”, the revolution in Ukraine and the subsequent Russia’s annexation of Crimea, the Russian military operation in Syria, the 2015 crisis in Russian-Turkish relations, and the attempted military coup in Turkey in 2016. Regional crises near the borders of Russia and Turkey and the growing securitization of the policies of both states not only pushed Moscow and Ankara to interact in the security sphere but also created new challenges for their relations. In this article, the authors examine the dynamics of Russian-Turkish relations, paying particular attention to the security dimension, as well as the opportunities and limitations for cooperation between the two countries, given that security is becoming an increasingly important element in bilateral relations. The main focus is on the analysis of competitive cooperation between Russia and Turkey in Eurasia, for the understanding of which it is necessary to refer not only to the current context but also to the historical experience of interaction between the two countries in this wide geographical space.

Keywords: Russia, Turkey, NATO, security, Eurasia, Middle East, regional conflicts


REFERENCES

1. Akturk Ş. Toward a Turkish-Russian Axis? Conflicts in Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, and Cooperation over Nuclear Energy. Insight Turkey, 2014, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 13-22.

2. Russian-Turkish oba-na. Kommersant, 29.12.2020. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4637028 (accessed 17.03.2021).

3. Kostem S. The Political Economy of Turkish-Russian Relations: Dynamics of Asymmetric Interdependence. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 2018, vol. XXIII, no. 2, pp. 10-32.

4. Akturk Ş. Turkish–Russian Relations after the Cold War (1992–2002). Turkish Studies, 2006, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 337-364. DOI: 10.1080/14683840600891034

5. Shlykov P. Russian-Turkish Relations in the Wider Black Sea Region: Cooperation and Competition. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 93-117.

6. Akturk Ş. Relations between Russia and Turkey Before, During, and After the Failed Coup of 2016. Insight Turkey, 2019, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 97-113.

7. Akturk Ş. Counter-hegemonic Visions and Reconciliation through the Past: The Case of Turkish Eurasianism. Ab Imperio, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 207-238. DOI: 10.1353/imp.2004.0110

8. Torbakov I. Neo-Ottomanism versus Neo-Eurasianism? Nationalism and Symbolic Geography in Postimperial Turkey and Russia. Mediterranean Quarterly, 2017, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 125-145. DOI: 10.1215/10474552-4164303

9. Celik N., İşeri E. Islamically Oriented Humanitarian NGOs in Turkey: AKP Foreign Policy Parallelism. Turkish Studies, 2016, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 429-448. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2016.1204917

10. Mufti M. The AK Party’s Islamic Realist Political Vision: Theory and Practice. Politics and Governance, 2014, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 28-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v2i2.48

11. Milevschi O. The Russian factor in the Wider Black Sea Region: Inconclusive Status Quo or a Neo-Imperial Strategy? New Regionalism or No Regionalism? Emerging Regionalism in the Black Sea Area. London; New York: Routledge, 2012, ðp. 111-137.

12. Rider A. Comparing Continental Empires. The Russian Empire in Comparative Perspective. Miller A.I. ed. Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2004, ðp. 33-69. (In Russ.)

13. Whitmore B. A Limited Partnership. Four Things We Need to Understand About the Russian-Turkish Relationship. Available at: https://cepa.org/a-limited-partnership/ (accessed 17.03.2021).

14. Haugom L. Turkish Foreign Policy under Erdogan: A Change in International Orientation? Comparative Strategy, 2019, vol. 38, no 3, pp. 206-223. DOI: 10.1080/01495933.2019.1606662

15. Miller A.I. The Romanov Empire and Nationalism: Essays in the Methodology of Historical Research. Moscow, New Literary Observer. 2006. 248 p. (In Russ.)

16. Markedonov S. Russia-Turkey Relations and Security Issues in the Caucasusus. Russia in Global Affairs, 30.05.2016. Available at: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/russia-turkey-relations-and-security-issues-in-the-caucasus/ (accessed 17.03.2021).

17. Yeşilot O., Ozdemir B. The Future of Turkish-Russian Relations: Competition or Cooperation? Marmara Turkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2016, vol. III, iss. 2, pp. 55-73. (In Turk.) DOI: 10.16985/MTAD.2016227942

18. Hirst S.J. Anti-Westernism on the European Periphery: The Meaning of Soviet-Turkish Convergence in the 1930s. Slavic Review, 2013, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 32-53. DOI: 10.5612/slavicreview.72.1.0032

19. Trenin D. Post-Imperium: A Eurasian Story. Washington, D.C., Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2011. 279 p.

20. Tanchum M. The Logic Beyond Lausanne: A Geopolitical Perspective on the Congruence between Turkey’s New Hard Power and its Strategic Reorientation. Insight Turkey, 2020, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 41-54. DOI: 10.25253/99.2020223.03

21. Mustafa Aydın, Fulya Ereker. Security in Turkey: Perception Politics and Structure. Istanbul, Istanbul Bilgi University Yayınları, 2013. 80 p. (In Turk.)

22. Trenin D. To Understand Ukraine. Russia in Global Affairs, 27.12.2017. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/ponyat-ukrainu/ (accessed 17.03.2021).

23. Trenin D. The Ukraine Crisis and the Resumption of Great-Power Rivalry. Carnegie Moscow Center, 09.07.2014. Available at: https:/carnegie.ru/2014/07/09/ukraine-crisis-and-resumption-of-great-power-rivalry-pub-56113 (accessed 17.03.2021).

24. Balta E., Celikpala M. Turkey and Russia: Historical Patterns and Contemporary Trends in Bilateral Relations. The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics. Guneş Murat Tezcur, ed. Oxford University Press, 2018, ðp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190064891.013.12

25. Celikpala M., Erşen E. Turkey’s Black Sea Predicament: Challenging or Accommodating Russia? Andrey Kortunov et al., Emre Erşen et al. Igor Ivanov (Editor-in-Chief). Deepening Russia-Turkey Relations: Report No. 41, 2019. Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). Moscow, NPMP RIAC, 2019, ðp. 56-70.

26. Idiz S. Cracks in Turkish-Russian Ties Begin to Show. Al-Monitor, 23.10.2020. Available at: https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/10/turkey-russia-s400-tested-cracks-ankara-moscow-ties-show.html (accessed 17.03.2021).

27. Foreign Policy from 2020 to 2021 (1) Competition, Conflict and Cooperation with Russia go hand in hand. Hurriyet, 29.12.2020. (In Turk.) Available at: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/sedat-ergin/2020den-2021e-dis-politika-1-rusya-ile-rekabet-catisma-ve-isbirligi-el-ele-yuruyor-41700719 (accessed 17.03.2021).

28. Doğantekin V. Turkey pulling out of NATO body blow to alliance. Anadolu Agency, 10.06.2019. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/politics/turkey-pulling-out-of-nato-body-blow-to-alliance/1500684 (accessed 17.03.2021).

29. Aydıntaşbaş A., Shapiro J. Biden and Erdogan. Are Trapped in a Double Fantasy. Why Washington and Ankara don’t get each other at all – and need each other anyway. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/01/06/biden-america-and-erdogan-turkey-are-trapped-in-a-double-fantasy/ (accessed 17.03.2021).

30. Karakullukcu M., Trenin D., Vatansever A., Malashenko A., Zvyagelskaya I., Shlykov P. Exploring the Prospects for Russian-Turkish Cooperation in a Turbulent Neighborhood. Global Relation Forum & Carnegie Moscow Center Working Group, İstanbul, 2014. 30 p.

31. Svarin D. Towards a Eurasian Axis? Russia and Turkey between Cooperation and Competition. Global Affairs, 2015, vol. 1, no. 4-5, pp. 381-398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2015.1117250

32. No Turkish peacekeepers to be sent to Nagorno-Karabakh – Lavrov. TASS, 12.11.2020. Available at: https://tass.com/politics/1222931 (accessed 17.03.2021).

33. Turkey’s forces to join Nagorno-Karabakh peacekeeping mission, defense minister says. TASS, 12.11.2020. Available at: https://tass.com/world/1222903 (accessed 17.03.2021).

34. Rettman A. There is no ‘Russia-Turkey Alliance’. Observer, 24.11.2020. Available at: https://euobserver.com/foreign/150151 (accessed 17.03.2021).

35. Basri A.A. Turkish foreign policy-making vis-a-vis the Ukraine crisis: From Sevres syndrome and Russophobia perspective. Diss. İstanbul Bilgi Unıversıtı, 2018. 101 p.

36. Graham T., Trenin D. How to Safely Manage U.S. – Russian Great Power. Carnegie Moscow Center, 11.12.2020. Available at: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/83432 (accessed 17.03.2021).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Sherstyukov S., Bodishteanu N. Russian-Turkish Relations after 2015: New Trends, Old Dilemmas. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 88-96. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-11-88-96



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 3
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Bretton Woods 2.0: Towards a New Global Financial Architecture
  • Transformation of the EU Political Party System on the Eve of the 2024 European Election
  • South Asia in Regional and World Politics
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.